Dekonstruksi Film Taare Zameen Par dalam Perspektif Karakter Luhur Guru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um064v4i12024p67-75Keywords:
noble character of the teacher, Taare Zameen Par, deconstrucon, differenated learning, educaonal environmentAbstract
The phenomenon of learners experiencing alienation and feeling subaltern in their own internal and external environments is prevalent in the field of education. This study explores this issue through the case example presented in the movie "Taare Zameen Par". The primary objective of this research is to deconstruct the movie based on the noble character of the teacher, highlighting its urgency and implications. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data collection was conducted through literature review and references to scientific sources such as books, validated research results, and academic journals. The findings indicate that the noble character of teachers has a profoundly significant impact on the educational landscape, benefiting both teachers and students. The movie "Taare Zameen Par" offers numerous lessons, illustrating that teachers must think critically to deconstruct and understand the events occurring in their surroundings, particularly those directly related to their students. Teachers must recognize and embrace each learner's unique qualities, which are inherent to their nature. This acceptance and celebration of diversity are crucial for achieving differentiated learning. Consequently, the role of the teacher as a facilitator can be effectively fulfilled in accordance with established educational principles. The study underscores the necessity for teachers to embody noble characteristics, which not only enhance the learning experience but also foster an inclusive and supportive educational environment. Through this deconstruction, the research provides insights into how teachers can better support their students by acknowledging their individual differences and promoting a more personalized approach to education.
References
Bharucha, R. (2010). Art as a pedagogical tool in inclusive education: Lessons from Taare Zameen Par. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(8), 424-428.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dewantara, K. H. (2013). Pendidikan: Ki Hajar Dewantara. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
Erickson, H. L. (2002). Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction: Teaching Beyond the Facts. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Eryaman, M. Y., & Schneider, B. (2017). Evidence and Public Good in Educational Policy, Research and Practice. Springer.
Fullan, M. (2011). The Moral Imperative Realized. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hariandi, A., & Irawan, Y. (2016). Peran Guru dalam Penanaman Nilai Karakter (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Isyalhana, N., & Kurniawati, F. (2020). Disleksia pada Anak: Penyebab, Gejala, dan Penanganannya. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Junaidin, H. (2023). Etika dalam Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Praktik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Junaidin, J. (2023). Etika Profesi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Sebagai Sistem Kontrol di Era 5.0. EL-HIKMAH: Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 17(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.20414/elhikmah.v17i1.8426
Lubis, A. (2014). Postmodernisme: Teori dan Metode. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Lusiana, D. (2022). Transformasi Kampung jodipan dari Stigma Kampung Kumuh
Lubis, Z. (2014). Dekonstruksi dalam Kajian Sastra dan Budaya. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Menjadi Kampung Warna-Warni di Kota Malang (Vol. 0, Issue 0). Universitas Udayana. http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/seni-desain/article/view/54588
Nawawi, H., & Sidiq, A. (2018). *Profesionalisme Guru dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kontemporer*. Surabaya: Lembaga Kajian Pendidikan.
Religius di Lingkungan Sekolah pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Gentala Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.22437/gentala.v1i1.7097
Rifki, M., Sauri, S., Abdussalam, A., Supriadi, U., & Parid, M. (2023). Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Karakter melalui Metode Keteladanan Guru di Sekolah. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4274
Santrock, J. W. (2004). Educational Psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Septiana, N. Z. (2022). Pelatihan Respectfull Mind untuk Mengembangkan Karakter Respek Mahasiswa. Realita : Jurnal Penelitian dan Kebudayaan Islam, 17(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.30762/realita.v17i2.1863
Sharma, A. (2007). Taare Zameen Par. Mumbai: Aamir Khan Productions.
Sidiq, U. (2018). Etika dan Profesi Keguruan. In STAI Muhammadiyah Tulungagung
Singh, R. (2011). Teaching methodologies: Insights from Taare Zameen Par. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(5), 45-53.
Suparlan, P. (2015). Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Supriadi, M. R. P., & Hidajat, R. (2023). Pergeseran Fungsi Penyajian Tari Terbang Bandung di Sanggar Dharma Budaya Kota Pasuruan. JoLLA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts, 3(6), 804-813. https://doi.org/10.17977/um064v3i62023p804-813
Supriadi, T., & Hidajat, R. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria: ASCD.
Wangid, M. N. (2009). Pengembangan Model Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 1(1), 15-25.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.