Children’s Voice in AI-Mediated STEAM Learning: A Qualitative Study in Early Childhood Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v7.i4.2027.1Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Children’s voice, Early childhood education, Generative AI, STEAM learningAbstract
Children’s voice is central to participatory early childhood education, yet little is known about how conversational artificial intelligence (AI) may mediate children’s expression and participation within STEAM learning. This qualitative descriptive study examined how ChatGPT Voice mediated children’s voice during AI-supported STEAM activities in an early childhood education setting in Central Java, Indonesia. Participants were 20 children aged 5–6 years and two classroom teachers. Data were generated from May to July 2026 through eight classroom observation sessions lasting approximately 45–60 minutes each across six AI-mediated STEAM activities, semi-structured interviews with the two teachers, and documentation, and were analyzed thematically. Five qualitative patterns were identified: AI opened an additional space for expression; functioned as a responsive interactional audience; accompanied task-level agency; provided shared prompts for collaborative voice; and exposed developmental and communicative barriers requiring teacher mediation. These findings represent context-bound qualitative patterns rather than evidence that ChatGPT Voice directly increased children’s participation. Conversational AI may therefore complement, rather than replace, teacher-led participatory pedagogy when interaction is developmentally appropriate, critically mediated, and embedded in hands-on and peer-collaborative activity.References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Correia, N., Aguiar, C., & Amaro, F. (2023). Children’s participation in early childhood education: A theoretical overview. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 24(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949120981789
Crescenzi-Lanna, L. (2023). Literature review of the reciprocal value of artificial and human intelligence in early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2128480
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hasibuan, R., Fitri, R., & Dewi, U. (2022). STEAM-based learning media: Assisting in developing children’s skills. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(6), 6863–6876. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i6.3560
Hayes, N. (2024). ‘It’s not fair’: Hearing the voices of young children. Education 3-13, 52(6), 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2332862
Heikka, J., Kettukangas, T., Turja, L., & Heiskanen, N. (2022). How educators commit to enhancing children’s participation in early childhood education pedagogical plans. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 12(1), Article a1170. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v12i1.1170
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Buckingham Shum, S., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15873–15892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kewalramani, S., & Veresov, N. (2022). Multimodal creative inquiry: Theorising a new approach for children’s science meaning-making in early childhood education. Research in Science Education, 52(3), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10029-3
Knauf, H., & Lepold, M. (2021). The children’s voice—How do children participate in analog and digital portfolios? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(5), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1906291
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033
Luo, W., He, H., Liu, J., Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., Zhou, Y., & Li, H. (2024). Aladdin’s genie or Pandora’s box for early childhood education? Experts chat on the roles, challenges, and developments of ChatGPT. Early Education and Development, 35(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2214181
Motimona, P. D., & Maryatun, I. B. (2023). Implementasi metode pembelajaran STEAM pada Kurikulum Merdeka pada PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 6493–6504. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.4682
Pascal, C., & Bertram, T. (2021). What do young children have to say? Recognising their voices, wisdom, agency and need for companionship during the COVID pandemic. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1872676
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2024). Powerful or mediocre? Kindergarten teachers’ perspectives on using ChatGPT in early childhood education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6496–6508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2266490
Su, J., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100072
Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
Su, J., Yang, W., Yim, I. H. Y., Li, H., & Hu, X. (2024). Early artificial intelligence education: Effects of cooperative play and direct instruction on kindergarteners’ computational thinking, sequencing, self-regulation and theory of mind skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 2917–2925. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13040
Su, J., Yim, I. H. Y., Wegerif, R., & Chu, S. K. W. (2025). STEAM in early childhood education: A scoping review. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(2), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2296445
Sung, J., Lee, J. Y., & Chun, H. Y. (2023). Short-term effects of a classroom-based STEAM program using robotic kits on children in South Korea. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00417-8
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel? ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Uğraş, H., & Uğraş, M. (2025). ChatGPT in early childhood STEM education: Can it be an innovative tool to overcome challenges? Education and Information Technologies, 30(4), 4277–4305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12960-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arnandiza Amirul Khafida, Ali Formen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





