Engineering Design Process and Creative Thinking in Lower Secondary Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v7.i2.2027.12Keywords:
Creative thinking, Engineering design process, STEAM, Student profileAbstract
The development of 21st-century competencies requires pupils to master technical skills and creative thinking in an integrated manner. However, science teaching in lower secondary schools has yet to develop Engineering Design Process (EDP) skills and creative thinking. This study aims to identify the profile of EDP skills and creative thinking amongst pupils as a basis for developing STEAM-based science teaching. The method used in this study is quantitative descriptive. EDP skills were measured using essay questions and a performance assessment rubric, whilst creative thinking was assessed through essay questions and an observation sheet. The research participants were Year 8 pupils from a lower secondary school in Central Java. The findings indicate that over 80% of pupils were categorised as having low to very low EDP skills. The highest average performance was observed during the brainstorming stage (68%), whilst the lowest was found during the iteration and refinement stage (33%). Regarding creative thinking, 52% of pupils were classified as less creative, with elaboration showing the strongest performance (59%). The main weaknesses were identified in flexibility and originality. These findings indicate a gap between students’ confidence in generating design ideas and their technological proficiency, evaluation skills, and capacity to refine solutions. The study concludes that learning should emphasise prototyping, iteration, evaluation and cognitive flexibility.References
Baze, C., González-Howard, M., Sampson, V., Fenech, M., Crawford, R., Hutner, T., Chu, L., & Hamilton, X. (2023). Understanding student use of epistemic criteria in engineering design contexts. Science Education, 107(4), 1033–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21795
Chen, C.-H., & Lin, Y.-C. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, Article 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hidayati, N., Widodo, A., & Riandi. (2020). Analisis keterampilan proses sains dan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran IPA terpadu. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 234–242.
National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K–12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/12635
Kelly, G. J., & Cunningham, C. M. (2019). Epistemic tools in engineering design for K–12 education. Science Education, 103(4), 1080–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21513
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka.
King, D., & English, L. D. (2016). Engineering design in the primary school: Applying STEM concepts to build an optical instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2762–2794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1262567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1262567
Mangold, J., & Robinson, S. (2013). The engineering design process as a problem solving and learning tool in K–12 classrooms. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22581
Marliani, R. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa melalui model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i1.166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i1.166
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K–12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069
Muneer, S., Santhosh, M., Parangusan, H., & Bhadra, J. (2026). A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 36, 919–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-10005-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-10005-2
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117407
Purwanto, E., Suyanto, S., & Nurcahyo, H. (2021). Profil keterampilan abad 21 siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran IPA berbasis proyek. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 45–56.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Suparman, M. A. (2012). Desain instruksional modern. Erlangga.
Sulianto, J., Purnamasari, V., & Febriarianto, B. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran think-pair-share terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas V (lima) materi organ tubuh manusia dan hewan. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v3i2.18515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v3i2.18515
Syukur, A., Azis, R., & Sukarsih. (2020). Developing reading learning model to increase reading skill for animal husbandry students in higher education. Britain International of Linguistics, Arts and Education, 2(1), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v2i1.220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v2i1.220
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual, verbal tests, Forms A and B, figural tests, Forms A and B. Personnel Press.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
van Broekhoven, K., Cropley, D., & Seegers, P. (2020). Differences in creativity across art and STEM students: We are more alike than unalike. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, Article 100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100707
Wahyu, Y., Edu, A. L., & Taklal, R. S. M. (2025). Integrating local culture and ethnoscience in Manggarai-based STEM education to enhance science literacy and scientific attitudes in the 21st century. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 31(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v31i12025p87-94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v31i12025p87-94
Wahyuni, I., Slameto, & Setyaningtyas, E. W. (2018). Penerapan model PBL berbantuan role playing untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar IPS. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(4), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i4.16152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i4.16152
Williams, F. E. (1993). Assessing creative thinking in the classroom. Creative Education Foundation.
Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). The steps of the Engineering Design Process (EDP) in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.766201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.766201
Xue, X., Liu, X., & Ahmad, N. J. (2026). Exploring the impact of STEM education based on engineering design process model on eighth graders’ engineering thinking and engineering career interest. Research in Science & Technological Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2026.2660370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2026.2660370
Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the U.S. as a practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072–1086. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Efriana Arga Trian, Fenny Roshayanti, Nur Khoiri, Muhammad Syaipul Hayat, Dido Sujaya Perwinda, Muhamad Bariq Atsila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
