Discourse on Development and Marginalization of Local Communities: A Critical Discourse Analysis of National Strategic Projects in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v7.i3.2027.5Keywords:
Critical discourse analysis, Development discourse, Developmentalism, Marginalization, National strategic projectsAbstract
This study examines how development discourse is constructed, disseminated, and embedded in relations of power and the marginalization of local communities within Indonesia’s National Strategic Projects. Using Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the study adopts a qualitative critical approach encompassing three dimensions: textual analysis, discursive practice, and social practice. The data consist of online news articles, government statements, policy documents, and related digital content concerning national strategic projects, collected through documentation and literature study and analyzed through textual, discursive-practice, and social-practice analysis. The findings reveal that, at the textual level, national strategic projects development is constructed through positive diction, progressive metaphors, technocratic terminology, and euphemistic expressions that legitimize development while obscuring social conflicts, land disputes, and the experiences of affected communities. At the level of discursive practice, government institutions occupy a dominant position in producing development narratives, while online and mass media facilitate their circulation and reproduction, contributing to the normalization of dominant development narratives and limiting the visibility of alternative perspectives. At the level of social practice, national strategic projects discourse is embedded in broader relations of state power, developmentalist ideology, privileged forms of knowledge, and social inequality, which contribute to the marginalization of local communities. Overall, the study demonstrates that national strategic projects development discourse functions not merely as a means of communicating development policies but also as a discursive mechanism through which meanings of progress are constructed, particular interests are legitimized, and unequal relations of power are reproduced.
References
Achyansyah, M. N., & Djuyandi, Y. (2026). Public interest as an ‘empty signifier’: Discourse hegemony strategy of pro-dam group in the contestation of the development discourse of the Bener Dam National Strategic Project. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 11(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v11i2.59227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v11i2.59227
Agustino, L., Hikmawan, M. D., & Silas, J. (2024). Is it possible for sustainability? The case from the new capital city of Indonesia. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1362337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1362337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1362337
Aura, S., & Abidin, M. Z. (2025). Protection of Indigenous peoples’ customary rights in National Strategic Projects (PSN): A study the case of the development of the Capital City of the Archipelago (IKN). Sanskara Hukum dan HAM, 4(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v4i01.540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v4i01.540
Bernard, C., Aurelya, C., Kurniano, R. C., & Yanur, M. (2025). Marginalisasi masyarakat adat di Nusantara: Ancaman konflik sosial dan penghambatan tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v10i2.27255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v10i2.27255
Chae, Y.-G. (2008). Development discourse. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecd027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecd027
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Delphine, D., Witte, P. A., & Spit, T. J. M. (2022). Bridging the perception gap? When top-down built megaprojects meet bottom-up perceptions: A case study of Suramadu Bridge, Indonesia. Asian Geographer, 39(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2020.1750441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2020.1750441
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Iffah, R. N., Bachari, A. D., & Fadlilah, A. (2025). Analisis wacana kritis terhadap penolakan pembangunan IKN pada wacana berita daring di Indonesia. Deskripsi Bahasa, 8(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.22146/db.15264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/db.15264
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2024, March 24). Pemerintah tetapkan 14 PSN baru, hasil kajian lengkap untuk pemerataan sektor pembangunan dari infrastruktur hingga pariwisata, pendidikan, dan kesehatan. https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5687/pemerintah-tetapkan-14-psn-baru-hasil-kajian-lengkap-untuk-pemerataan-sektor-pembangunan-di-seluruh-indonesia
Kodir, A. (2026). Situated environmental justice: Theorizing distributional inequity in Indonesia’s National Strategic Projects (PSN). JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik), 30(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.114218
Kooy, M. (2008). Technologies of government: Constituting subjectivities, spaces, and infrastructures in colonial and contemporary Jakarta. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00791.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00791.x
Meckelburg, R., & Wardana, A. (2024). The political economy of land acquisition for development in the public interest: The case of Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 137, 107017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107017
Meka, R. S., Sabardila, A., & Markhamah. (2025). Representasi Ibu Kota Nusantara dalam pemberitaan Detik.com: Analisis wacana kritis berbasis korpus. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 21(2), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.25134/rx4fpj93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/rx4fpj93
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Rev. ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nilsen, A. G. (2016). Power, resistance and development in the Global South: Notes towards a critical research agenda. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29, 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9224-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9224-8
Nurpadillah, V., Mardikantoro, H. B., Mulyaningsih, I., & Wilsa, A. W. (2025). Power and identity representation in news on Indonesia’s capital relocation: A Fairclough critical discourse analysis. Sawerigading, 31(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v31i2.1626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v31i2.1626
Pieterse, J. N. (1991). Dilemmas of development discourse: The crisis of developmentalism and the comparative method. Development and Change, 22(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1991.tb00401.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1991.tb00401.x
Rossi, B. (2004). Revisiting Foucauldian approaches: Power dynamics in development projects. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022038042000233786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022038042000233786
Said, M. A. A., & Ridho, S. (2025). National Strategic Projects that are not strategic for small communities: A critical discourse analysis on Tempo.co and Kompas.com. Jurnal Communio: Jurnal Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi, 14(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.35508/jikom.v14i1.9606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35508/jikom.v14i1.9606
Suhandano, S., Firmonasari, A., & Isti’anah, A. (2024). Infrastructure discourse in Indonesian media: An ecolinguistic perspective. World of Media: Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 2024(3), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2024.3
Sukmana, E., & Azizah, A. (2024). New capital city of Indonesia, an opportunity or threat for ecotourism resilience in East Borneo. Journal of Disaster Research, 19(1), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2024.p0214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2024.p0214
Talitha, T. (2026). Megaprojects as a “space of exception”: Unraveling institutional and policy dynamics in Indonesia’s national strategic projects agenda. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 44(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544251353061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544251353061
Thompson, M. P. A. (2004). ICT, power, and developmental discourse: A critical analysis. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00131.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00131.x
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications.
Wardana, A., & Darmawardana, D. A. (2024). Pembangunan sebagai proses eksklusi: Kajian hukum dan ekonomi-politik atas Proyek Strategis Nasional. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 54(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol54.no2.1580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol54.no2.1580
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asisda Wahyu Asri Putradi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
