Development of AI-Based Algorithm Learning Media with a Personalized Learning and Mediated Learning Experience Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i7.2026.5Keywords:
AI learning media, Personalized learning, Mediated learning experience, SUS, Phase E InformaticsAbstract
Algorithm learning in Informatics at Phase E requires media that can adapt to the individual needs of students. However, most conventional media remain static and one-directional. This study develops an AI-based algorithm learning medium that integrates the principles of personalized learning and Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) using the ADDIE model. It also evaluates usability through the System Usability Scale (SUS) and thematic analysis involving 22 tenth-grade high school students. The MLE principles intentionality, meaning, transcendence, and competence are translated into system features through a Socratic AI dialogue architecture. The average SUS score is 77.39 (SD = 12.87; 95% CI [71.68, 83.10]), which falls within the Acceptable range (Grade B–C). Thematic analysis identifies five main themes, with appreciation for content personalization (41%) and technical constraints (36%) emerging as the most prominent findings. The main contribution of this study is conceptual and design-oriented. It proposes a framework that maps personalized learning and MLE principles into concrete features within AI-based educational media.References
Andrzejewska, M., & Stolińska, A. (2022). Do structured flowcharts outperform pseudocode? Evidence from eye movements. IEEE Access, 10, 132965–132975. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3230981
Aripin, J. J., Suryana, Hendrayati, H., Sulistyowati, R., Muhamat, A. A., & Rafliansyah, F. M. (2026). AI integration in entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the mediating role of self-efficacy. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i4.2026.4
Ashizuka, E. (2023). Who is like a teacher and mediator? Mediated Learning Experience: International Practices and Advances, 1(1). Feuerstein Institute.
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967
Du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. Heliyon, 10(21), e39630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630
Fortuna, A., Prasetya, F., Kaya, D., Raihan, M., Samala, A. D., Andriani, W., Rawas, S., Safitri, D., Criollo-C, S., & Nabawi, R. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in personalized learning: A global systematic review of current advancements and shaping future opportunities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102114
Gonda, D., Ďuriš, V., Tirpáková, A., & Pavlovičová, G. (2022). Teaching algorithms to develop the algorithmic thinking of informatics students. Mathematics, 10(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203857
Ikhsanudin, I., Subali, B., Retnawati, H., & Istiyono, E. (2024). Estimation of Cronbach reliability based on sample size, gender, and grades. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(2), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.24895
Kepmendikbudristek No. 56/M/2022 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(56). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2007). A framework for evaluating the quality of multimedia learning resources. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 44–59. https://www.sfu.ca/~jcnesbit/articles/LeacockNesbit2007.pdf
Lin, C.-C., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Lu, O. H. T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y
Mardeli, Sari, J. P., Setyaningsih, K., Fauzi, M., Fitri, E., Ballianie, N., & Novianti, R. (2025). Generative AI in personalized learning: A systematic review of implementation in Indonesia. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1672
Pesovski, I., Santos, R., Henriques, R., & Trajkovik, V. (2024). Generative AI for customizable learning experiences. Sustainability, 16(7), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073034
Pujakesuma, D., Ningrum, G. D. K., & Umami, A. A. (2024). Implementasi teknologi augmented reality dalam pengembangan media pembelajaran interaktif untuk siswa kelas X. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v4.i6.2024.4
Tang, K. S., Cooper, G., Rappa, N., Cooper, M., Sims, C., & Nonis, K. (2024). A dialogic approach to transform teaching, learning & assessment with generative AI in secondary education: A proof of concept. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 19(3), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2024.2379774
Vargas-Arteaga, J., & Gravini-Donado, M. L. (2024). Evaluating the usability of a gamified virtual course designed to teach cultural heritage. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 19(4), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v19i04.45053
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach’s alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1074430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430
Zehr, J. M. (2023). The master teacher. Mediated Learning Experience: International Practices and Advances, 1(1). Feuerstein Institute.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eki Nugraha, Salman Haykal Ramadhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
