Implementation of Non-Cognitive Dimension Assessment through Caring Assessment in Informatics Learning Eighth Grade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i5.2026.8Keywords:
Caring assessment, Informatics learning, Learning experience, Student perceptionAbstract
Assessment practices in learning still often focus on measuring cognitive achievement, while the non-cognitive and emotional dimensions of students have not been fully accommodated. This study aims to examine the implementation of Caring Assessment in Informatics learning eighth grade junior high school, find out students' perceptions of its application, and understand how the principle of caring affects students' learning experience. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach with simple quantitative support design involving 32 eighth grade students in one of the junior high schools in Purwakarta Regency. Data was collected through learning observations, student interviews, in-depth interviews, and student perception questionnaires adapted from the Perceived Caring Scale with four dimensions, namely attention, empathy, support, and feedback. The results of the study showed that Caring Assessment was carried out very well in learning practice and was perceived very positively by students in all aspects measured. Support emerges as the most powerful dimension, while empathy appears to be a more subtle dimension, but it is still perceived to be very high. Observation and interview data also show that Caring Assessment contributes to creating a safer, supportive, and meaningful learning environment, so that students feel more helped, valued, and more courageous to engage in learning. Thus, Caring Assessment not only functions as a means of assessing learning outcomes, but also as a pedagogical practice that supports a more complete student learning experience.References
Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher–student interactions and student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1177–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09649-y
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2024). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen: Pendidikan anak usia dini, pendidikan dasar, dan pendidikan menengah (Edisi revisi 2024). Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Carby, N. (2023). Personalized feedback in a virtual learning environment. Journal of Educational Supervision, 6(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.6.1.3
Delianidi, M., Diamantaras, K. I., Moras, I., & Sidiropoulos, A. (2025). DK-PRACTICE: An intelligent educational platform for personalized learning content recommendations based on students’ knowledge state (arXiv:2501.10373). arXiv.
Laveault, D., & Allal, L. (Eds.). (2016). Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0
Lehman, B., Sparks, J. R., Zapata-Rivera, D., Steinberg, J., & Forsyth, C. (2024). A culturally enhanced framework of caring assessments for diverse learners. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 29(9).
Machkour, M., Benlahmar, E., & Yassine, M. (2025). Inclusive assessment pathways in digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1123–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12547-6
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2022). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment. Educational Psychologist, 57(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2117146
Rahmawati, R., Junaenah, S., Alfiyyah, A. A., & Nugraha, E. (2024). Problematika menilai ranah kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik pada mata pelajaran IPAS Kurikulum Merdeka tingkat SD. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v11i4.82877
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Sparks, J. R., Lehman, B., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2024). Caring assessments: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1216481. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1216481
Sun, Y. (2021). The effect of teacher caring behavior and teacher praise on students’ engagement in EFL classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 746871. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746871
Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379069
Thornberg, R., Forsberg, C., Hammar Chiriac, E., & Bjereld, Y. (2022). Teacher–student relationship quality and student engagement: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864772
Tim Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). Modul asesmen diagnosis di awal pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M., & den Brok, P. (2024). Secondary school teachers’ use of formative assessment practice to create co-regulated learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-024-00089-9
Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2022). Elo-rating-based adaptive assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 187, 115915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115915
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second language acquisition: The role of teachers’ caring and students’ engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874522
Yan, Z. (2023). Student self-assessment as a process for learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003162605
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2021). Assessment as learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09547-9
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2021). Assessment as learning: How does it work? Dalam Z. Yan & L. Yang (Eds.), Assessment as learning: Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement (hlm. 29–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003052081
Zhao, J., Zhang, L., & Yao, X. (2023). Teachers’ caring behavior in education. Education Sciences, 13(3), 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030300
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vara Aulia Saputri, Rizki Hikmawan, Aliatusholihah Amy Hasyim, Andre Nugraha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





