Implementation of Non-Cognitive Dimension Assessment through Caring Assessment in Informatics Learning Eighth Grade

Authors

  • Vara Aulia Saputri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Rizki Hikmawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Aliatusholihah AH Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Andre Nugraha State Junior High School 7 Purwakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i5.2026.8

Keywords:

Caring assessment, Informatics learning, Learning experience, Student perception

Abstract

Assessment practices in learning still often focus on measuring cognitive achievement, while the non-cognitive and emotional dimensions of students have not been fully accommodated. This study aims to examine the implementation of Caring Assessment in Informatics learning eighth grade junior high school, find out students' perceptions of its application, and understand how the principle of caring affects students' learning experience. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach with simple quantitative support design involving 32 eighth grade students in one of the junior high schools in Purwakarta Regency. Data was collected through learning observations, student interviews, in-depth interviews, and student perception questionnaires adapted from the Perceived Caring Scale with four dimensions, namely attention, empathy, support, and feedback. The results of the study showed that Caring Assessment was carried out very well in learning practice and was perceived very positively by students in all aspects measured. Support emerges as the most powerful dimension, while empathy appears to be a more subtle dimension, but it is still perceived to be very high. Observation and interview data also show that Caring Assessment contributes to creating a safer, supportive, and meaningful learning environment, so that students feel more helped, valued, and more courageous to engage in learning. Thus, Caring Assessment not only functions as a means of assessing learning outcomes, but also as a pedagogical practice that supports a more complete student learning experience.

References

Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher–student interactions and student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1177–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09649-y

Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2024). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen: Pendidikan anak usia dini, pendidikan dasar, dan pendidikan menengah (Edisi revisi 2024). Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Carby, N. (2023). Personalized feedback in a virtual learning environment. Journal of Educational Supervision, 6(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.6.1.3

Delianidi, M., Diamantaras, K. I., Moras, I., & Sidiropoulos, A. (2025). DK-PRACTICE: An intelligent educational platform for personalized learning content recommendations based on students’ knowledge state (arXiv:2501.10373). arXiv.

Laveault, D., & Allal, L. (Eds.). (2016). Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0

Lehman, B., Sparks, J. R., Zapata-Rivera, D., Steinberg, J., & Forsyth, C. (2024). A culturally enhanced framework of caring assessments for diverse learners. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 29(9).

Machkour, M., Benlahmar, E., & Yassine, M. (2025). Inclusive assessment pathways in digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1123–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12547-6

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y

Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2022). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment. Educational Psychologist, 57(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2117146

Rahmawati, R., Junaenah, S., Alfiyyah, A. A., & Nugraha, E. (2024). Problematika menilai ranah kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik pada mata pelajaran IPAS Kurikulum Merdeka tingkat SD. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v11i4.82877

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Sparks, J. R., Lehman, B., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2024). Caring assessments: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1216481. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1216481

Sun, Y. (2021). The effect of teacher caring behavior and teacher praise on students’ engagement in EFL classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 746871. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746871

Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379069

Thornberg, R., Forsberg, C., Hammar Chiriac, E., & Bjereld, Y. (2022). Teacher–student relationship quality and student engagement: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864772

Tim Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). Modul asesmen diagnosis di awal pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M., & den Brok, P. (2024). Secondary school teachers’ use of formative assessment practice to create co-regulated learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-024-00089-9

Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2022). Elo-rating-based adaptive assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 187, 115915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115915

Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second language acquisition: The role of teachers’ caring and students’ engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874522

Yan, Z. (2023). Student self-assessment as a process for learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003162605

Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2021). Assessment as learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09547-9

Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2021). Assessment as learning: How does it work? Dalam Z. Yan & L. Yang (Eds.), Assessment as learning: Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement (hlm. 29–46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003052081

Zhao, J., Zhang, L., & Yao, X. (2023). Teachers’ caring behavior in education. Education Sciences, 13(3), 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030300

Downloads

Published

02-05-2026

How to Cite

Saputri, V. A., Hikmawan, R., Aliatusholihah AH, A. A., & Nugraha, A. (2026). Implementation of Non-Cognitive Dimension Assessment through Caring Assessment in Informatics Learning Eighth Grade. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 6(5), 8. https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i5.2026.8

Issue

Section

Articles