Blended Learning and Learning Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Student Engagement in Indonesian Secondary Education

Authors

  • Rufi'i Rufi'i Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Dani Chandra Yudho Pranoto Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Budi Nur Rahman Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Sabrina Aulia Rizki Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Nurudeen Olalekan Orunbon Lagos State University
  • B. B. Harianto Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya
  • Sabariah Sabariah Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i4.2026.12

Keywords:

Blended learning, Educational technology, PLS-SEM, SmartPLS, Student engagement

Abstract

Blended learning has increasingly been adopted in secondary education as a strategic response to the demand for more effective and contemporary instructional practices; however, the mechanisms through which it influences academic achievement remain insufficiently explained. This study examines student engagement as a mediating process linking blended learning to learning outcomes, shifting the focus from technological integration toward learner-centered mechanisms. A cross-sectional quantitative design was employed using survey data from 300 secondary school students. Data were analyzed through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 4, involving assessment of measurement reliability and validity, followed by structural model and mediation analysis with 5,000 bootstrap resamples. The results demonstrate that blended learning has a significant positive effect on student engagement and learning outcomes, while student engagement also exerts a strong positive influence on learning outcomes. Mediation analysis confirms that student engagement partially mediates the relationship between blended learning and academic performance. These findings indicate that blended learning enhances learning outcomes both directly and indirectly by fostering students’ cognitive and behavioral involvement. Overall, the study highlights student engagement as a key mechanism through which blended learning environments translate instructional design into meaningful educational gains in secondary education contexts.

References

Alammary, A. (2024). Optimizing components selection in blended learning: Toward sustainable students engagement and success. Sustainability, 16(12), 4923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124923

Almarzuqi, A. A., & Mat, H. (2024). The effectiveness of blended learning on STEM achievement of secondary school students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i1/20140

Argyriou, P., Benamar, K., & Nikolajeva, M. (2022). What to blend? Exploring the relationship between student engagement and academic achievement via a blended learning approach. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 21(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221091512

Ashraf, M. A., Mollah, S., Perveen, S., Shabnam, N., & Nahar, L. (2022). Pedagogical applications, prospects, and challenges of blended learning in Chinese higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772322

Ashraf, M. A., Tsegay, S. M., Gull, N., Saeed, M., & Dawood, H. (2024). The role of blended learning in improving medical students’ academic performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Frontiers in Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1425659

Bandara, N., & Jayaweera, B. P. A. (2024). Commentary on the applications of blended learning in the teaching and learning process: A review. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.10

Basori, B., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Wiranto, W. (2023). Blended learning model towards vocational students’ learning outcomes: A scoping review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22986

Chen, H., & Isa, Z. B. M. (2024). Navigating new normal: Evaluating the effects of blended learning models on college student outcomes in Southwest China post-epidemic. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery, 3(05), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v3i05.236

Chen, P.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, I.-H., & Lo, C. O. (2022). The mediating effects of psychological capital and academic self-efficacy on learning outcomes of college freshmen. Psychological Reports, 126(5), 2489–2510. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221077026

Craig, C. A., Sayers, E. L. P., Gilbertz, S. J., Karam, R., & Feng, S. (2021). The role of STEM-based sustainability in business and management curricula: Exploring cognitive and affective outcomes in university students. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 46(4), 656–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211056316

Crooks, C., Ameratunga, R., Brewerton, M., Torok, M., Buetow, S., Brothers, S., Wall, C., & Jorgensen, P. (2010). Adverse reactions to food in New Zealand children aged 0-5 years. The New Zealand medical journal, 123(1327), 14–23.

Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2023). Examinations of the relationships between self-efficacy, self-regulation, teaching, cognitive presences, and learning engagement during COVID-19. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10187-3

ElSayad, G. (2023). Higher education students’ learning perception in the blended learning community of inquiry. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1061–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00290-y

ElSayad, G., Saad, N. H. M., & Ramayah, T. (2021). How higher education students in Egypt perceived online learning engagement and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(4), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00191-y

Fauziah, D. Z., Basori, B., & Maryono, D. (2021). The influence of LMS-based blended learning models on learning motivation and learning outcomes in network infrastructure administration. Journal of Informatics and Vocational Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/joive.v4i1.48632

Fei, G. C., Kowang, T. O., Rasli, A., & Long, C. S. (2019). Engagement in peer review, learner-content interaction and learning outcomes. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(5), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-04-2018-0038

Gabbett, T., Jenkins, D., & Abernethy, B. (2010). Physical collisions and injury during professional rugby league skills training. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(6), 578–583.

Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203

Halim, A. A., Othman, N., Majid, A. A., Yusof, A. N. M., Azri, N., & Samir, N. M. (2021). Students’ perceptions on the effectiveness of Islamic and Asian civilization MOOC as a blended learning course. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i12/11990

Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481

Hosseini, H. M., Fathi, J., Derakhshesh, A., & Mehraein, S. (2022). A model of classroom social climate, foreign language enjoyment, and student engagement among English as a foreign language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933842

Huy, C., Becker, S., Gomolinsky, U., Klein, T., & Thiel, A. (2008). Health, medical risk factors, and bicycle use in everyday life in the over-50 population. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 16(4), 454–464.

Khatri, P., Duggal, H. K., Dutta, S., Kumari, P., Thomas, A., Brod, T., & Colimoro, L. (2023). Unveiling heterogenous knowledge-oriented leadership and knowledge acquisition based hybrid work agility of knowledge workers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(11), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0793

Khilji, N. (2022). The use of virtual learning environment for students effective engagement in the higher education institutions through knowledge management and blended learning. European Conference on Knowledge Management, 23(1), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.23.1.452

Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H. (2019). The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0152-3

Li, J., Huang, J.-H., Hu, Z., & Zhao, X. (2022). Parent-child relationships and academic performance of college students: Chain-mediating roles of gratitude and psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794201

Li, S., Chen, J., & Liu, S. (2024). The moderating effect of self-regulated learning skills on online learning behaviour in blended learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3125–3148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13059

Low, M. C., Lee, C. K., Sidhu, M. S., Lim, S. P., Hasan, Z., & Lim, S. C. (2023). Blended learning for engineering education 4.0: Students’ perceptions and their learning difficulties. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1705–1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22668

Marshall, M., Carter, B., Rose, K., & Brotherton, A. (2009). Living with type 1 diabetes: Perceptions of children and their parents. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(12), 1703–1710.

Mulyatiningsih, E., Palupi, S., Ekawatiningsih, P., Firdausa, A. R., & Nuryana, Z. (2023). The enjoyable online learning model for vocational students during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23122

Nja, C., Erim, C. M., Eyo, E. O., Meremikwu, A. N., & Ekon, E. E. (2023). Undergraduate students’ predilection for seating pattern and their engagement in a collaborated blended learning in the science education classroom. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(4), 803–819. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i4.3508

Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2021). Exploring ESL learners’ blended learning experiences and its effectiveness through web-based technologies. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1436. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21465

Romli, N., Mohamed, S., Darami, A. I., Haris, S., & Isa, M. A. M. (2023). The effect of student performance towards the adoption of blended learning: A case study of investment students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i3/18614

Sefriani, R., Sepriana, R., Wijaya, I., Radyuli, P., & Menrisal, M. (2021). Blended learning with Edmodo: The effectiveness of statistical learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20826

She, L., Ma, L., Jan, A., Nia, H. S., & Rahmatpour, P. (2021). Online learning satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese university students: The serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936

Su, F., Zou, D., Wang, L., & Kohnke, L. (2023). Student engagement and teaching presence in blended learning and emergency remote teaching. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00263-1

Thompson C. (2010). Facebook--cautionary tales for nurses. Nursing New Zealand (Wellington, N.Z. : 1995), 16(7), 26.

Vega, N. D., Basri, M., & Nur, S. (2023). Integrating mobile-assisted learning for a dynamic blended approach in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 32(2), 819. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i2.pp819-827

Wafik, H. M. A., Mahbub, S., & Das, J. (2024). Optimizing strategies for enhanced effectiveness in blended learning models. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(7), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i07.017

Widowati, A., Siswanto, I., & Wakid, M. (2023). Factors affecting students’ academic performance: Self efficacy, digital literacy, and academic engagement effects. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 885–898. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16449a

Zhang, D., Liu, R., Li, X., Yuan, Y., & Zhou, G. (2023). How do self-exempt beliefs affect intentions to quit smoking? An exploration of the mediating role of threat appraisal and coping appraisal. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260561

Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Jiang, S., & Gao, J. (2024). Effects of perceived teacher support on student behavioral engagement in the blended learning environment: Learning experience as a mediator. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(5), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i5.6666

Downloads

Published

06-04-2026

How to Cite

Rufi’i, R., Pranoto, D. C. Y., Rahman, B. N., Rizki, S. A., Orunbon, N. O., Harianto, B. B., & Sabariah, S. (2026). Blended Learning and Learning Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Student Engagement in Indonesian Secondary Education. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 6(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i4.2026.12

Issue

Section

Articles