Analysis of Students’ Activities and Perceptions Toward Web-Based Virtual Laboratories in Science Learning

Authors

  • Safrijal Universitas Jabal Ghafur
  • Mulia Rahmi Universitas Jabal Ghafur
  • Basri Universitas Jabal Ghafur
  • Muhammad Yahya Universitas Jabal Ghafur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i10.2026.8

Keywords:

Perception, Physics learning, Student activities, Virtual laboratory, Website

Abstract

The use of web-based virtual laboratories in physics learning is considered capable of supporting the improvement of students’ science process skills and conceptual understanding. This study aims to: (1) examine the effect of implementing an interactive web-based virtual laboratory on physics learning activities, and (2) describe students’ perceptions of the use of the virtual laboratory. The study employed a pre-experimental method with a one-shot case study design. The research population consisted of all twelfth-grade students divided into four classes, with a sample of 24 students. Data collection was carried out through observations of science process skills to determine the impact of the intervention, as well as questionnaires distributed after the learning process to measure students' perceptions regarding their Science Process Skills (SPS) activities during the implementation. The results of the observational analysis showed an average percentage of science process skills activities of 89.9%, indicating that the interactive web-based virtual laboratory effectively supports virtual practical learning. Meanwhile, the analysis of students’ perceptions obtained an average score of 93.6%, categorized as very good. These findings indicate that virtual laboratories have the potential to become an effective innovation in physics learning. Nevertheless, further development in operational aspects is still needed to address various existing challenges.

References

Abdjul, T., Ntobuo, N. E., & Payu, C. (2019). Development of virtual laboratory-based learning to improve physics learning outcomes of high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 15(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v15i2.12367

Bybee, R. W. (Ed.). (2002). Learning science and the science of learning: Science educators' essay collection. National Science Teachers Association. https://doi.org/10.2505/9780873552080

Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Sahidu, H. (2016). Pengembangan model laboratorium virtual berorientasi pada kemampuan pemecahan masalah bagi calon guru fisika. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(2). 41–46. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:192479697

Ismail, R., Retnawati, H., & Setiawati, F. A. (2021). Optimal scale points for reliable measurements: Exploring the impact of scale point variation. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.34173

Istiqlal, M., Istiyono, E., Widihastuti, Sari, D. K., Danni, R., & Safitri, I. (2024). Construction of mathematics cognitive test instrument of computational thinking model for Madrasah Aliyah students. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i2.4425

Jong, T., Linn, M., & Zacharia, Z. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340, 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Implementasi dan evaluasi. Kemendikbud.

Kusumayuni, P. N., Suarni, N. K., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2023). Model discovery learning berbasis STEAM: Dampaknya terhadap hasil belajar IPA dan keterampilan proses sains siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 6(1), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v6i1.59771

Manikowati, Nf., & Iskandar, D. (2018). Pengembangan model mobile virtual laboratorium untuk pembelajaran praktikum siswa SMA. Jurnal Kwangsan, 6(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v6n1.p23--42

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V., & Jovanovic, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002

Rina Mirdayanti, & Murni. (2017). Kajian penggunaan laboratorium virtual berbasis simulasi sebagai upaya mengatasi ketidak-sediaan laboratorium. Visipena Journal, 8(2), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v8i2.415

Safitri, I., & Ansyari, R. (2024). The calibration of science achievement test based on integrated Islamic curriculum. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 329–336). https://doi.org/10.1145/3678726.3678727

Safitri, I., Chastanti, I., Hasibuan, L. R., Rohana, Sujarwo, Irmayanti, & Nasution, H. F. (2022). Teachers' readiness in the implementation of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(3), 1082–1089. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22463

Safitri, I., Muti'ah, R., & Sriono. (2022). Nilai-nilai karakter pada siswa SMP: Studi di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu. PT Mega Press Nusantara.

Safitri, I., Rosnawati, R., & Ansyari, R. (2024). Estimasi kesalahan pengukuran dalam penilaian sidang skripsi: Generalizability theory analysis. Afeksi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.35672/afeksi.v5i1.220

Setiawan, T., Dewi, U. M., Sari, A. M., & Absa, M. (n.d.). Application the quantum learning method using simulation media with the TANDUR strategy to improve student learning outcomes. Cocatalyst, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33830/cocatalyst.v1i1.5132

Sugiyono. (2016). Methods of quantitative, qualitative and R & D research. Alfabeta.

Swandi, A., & Amin, B. D. (2016). The development of student's worksheet of physics based on virtual simulation and its influence on physics learning outcomes of students. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:63137689

Yulianti, D., Khanafiyah, S., & Sugiyanto. (2012). Penerapan virtual experiment berbasis inkuiri untuk mengembangkan kemandirian mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v8i2.2152

Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2018). Implementasi pembelajaran fisika berbasis laboratorium virtual terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan persepsi mahasiswa. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i1.4378

Zacharia, Z., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21, 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001

Zulimah, Z., Abdurrahman, A., & Jalmo, T. (2018). The effectiveness of students' worksheet of virtual laboratory practice on dynamic electricity to improve science process skill. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 4(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.4.4.14

Downloads

Published

26-06-2026

How to Cite

Safrijal, S., Rahmi, M. ., Basri, B., & Yahya, M. (2026). Analysis of Students’ Activities and Perceptions Toward Web-Based Virtual Laboratories in Science Learning. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 6(10), 8. https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i10.2026.8

Issue

Section

Articles