Beyond Compliance: Washback Dynamics of Embedded Assessment Practices in Flipped Learning Environments Among EFL Undergraduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i10.2026.12Keywords:
Assessment scheduling, EFL, Flipped learning, Mixed methods, WashbackAbstract
Flipped learning has transformed higher education through frequent embedded assessment; however, limited research has examined its washback effects on students’ learning behavior. This study investigated positive and negative washback perceptions among undergraduate students in a flipped English as a Foreign Language (EFL) program and introduced the concept of a high-density washback environment (HDWE). A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 60 undergraduate students at a public university in North Sumatra, Indonesia, using a validated 14-item Washback Perception Questionnaire and analyzed through descriptive statistics, paired-samples t-tests, and PLS-SEM confirmatory composite analysis. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and one focus group discussion involving six participants and analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Positive washback was perceived at a high level and significantly exceeded moderate negative washback. Three qualitative themes emerged: self-regulated learning through pre-class assessment, cumulative assessment burden, and strategic compliance as ambivalent washback. The findings indicate that flipped learning assessment generally promotes positive learning behavior, although some responses reflect peer-mediated surface preparation rather than deep independent learning. The study proposes ambivalent washback as a distinct theoretical category and highlights assessment scheduling and instructional transparency as key factors influencing washback quality.
References
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115
Alqahtani, F. (2021). The impact of language testing washback in promoting teaching and learning processes: A theoretical review. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p21
Ardila, A. (2016). L. S. Vygotsky in the 21st century. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(4), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0401
Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300303
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n9
Cheng, L. (2026). Reimagining the washback ecosystem: New directions from Asia's high-stakes testing landscapes. Language Testing in Asia, 16(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-026-00424-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-026-00424-w
Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609731
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education (Vol. 25). Cambridge University Press & Cambridge ESOL.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). SAGE Publications.
Guetterman, T. C., Creswell, J. W., & Fetters, M. D. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
Hair, J. F., Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Harrison, M. F. (2025). The effect of the flipped learning model on grammar test scores and student perceptions in a South Korean EFL setting. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00332-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00332-1
Hasan, M. Z., Abidin, R. A. Z., Hashim, H. I. C., Yaacob, T. Z., & Fuzi, N. M. (2024). Revitalizing education in the 21st century: The evolution of the flipped classroom. In Flipped classrooms and learning (pp. 63–86). Springer.
Indonesian Ministry of Education, Research, and Technology. (2020). Buku panduan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Khan, A., Hassan, N., & Cheng, L. (2025). Investigating the contextual factors mediating washback effects of a learning-oriented English language assessment in Malaysia. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00359-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00359-8
Khayat, M. (2024). The effectiveness of the flipped learning approach on classroom perception and academic attitude in university students. Research & Development in Medical Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.33224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.33224
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Li, Z., & Li, J. (2022). Using the flipped classroom to promote learner engagement for the sustainable development of language skills: A mixed-methods study. Sustainability, 14(10), 5983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105983
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
Montasseri, Z., & Ahmadi, A. (2022). Washback effects of an interactional competence checklist. Teaching English Language, 16(2), 285–314.
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Phuong, H. Y., Le, T. T., & Pham, T. T. (2025). Assessment for learning or assessment for scoring? Washback of analytic rubrics in Vietnamese EFL classrooms. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00371-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00371-y
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). SmartPLS 4 [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
Ruengtam, P. (2026). Reframing flipped studio learning for transformative pedagogy in architecture and built environment education. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1726937. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1726937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1726937
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., & Perera, C. J. (2024). Flipped classroom. In Gamification in a flipped classroom: Pedagogical methods and best practices (pp. 11–65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2219-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2219-8_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tinur Rahmawati Harahap, Yulia Rizki Ramadhani, Rosni Harahap
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
