Elementary School Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices in Deep Learning Oriented Toward Critical and Creative Thinking

Authors

  • Juriana Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Agung Hartoyo Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Asriah Nurdini Mardiyyaningsih Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i10.2026.9

Keywords:

Creative thinking, Critical thinking, Deep learning, Elementary mathematics education, Pedagogical practices

Abstract

The rapid transformation of twenty-first-century education requires learning processes that foster students’ higher-order thinking skills, particularly critical and creative thinking. However, mathematics instruction in elementary schools often remains focused on procedural knowledge and answer-oriented learning. This study aims to explore teachers’ pedagogical practices in implementing deep learning-oriented instruction in place value learning and to examine their contribution to the development of students’ critical and creative thinking skills. A qualitative case study design was conducted in an elementary school involving a Grade V teacher, students, and school stakeholders. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. The data were analyzed using an interactive qualitative approach consisting of coding, categorization, and interpretation. The findings reveal that deep learning principles were partially integrated into classroom practice through contextual learning activities, collaborative tasks, the use of concrete learning media, questioning strategies, and reflective activities. Students demonstrated emerging abilities to explain their reasoning, compare numerical values, and connect mathematical concepts to real-life situations. Nevertheless, the development of critical and creative thinking skills remained uneven and at an early stage. Furthermore, assessment practices were still predominantly focused on procedural accuracy, which limited opportunities for students to engage in deeper reasoning and problem-solving processes. In conclusion, deep learning-oriented instruction shows considerable potential for enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills in mathematics learning. However, its effectiveness depends on stronger alignment among lesson planning, instructional implementation, and assessment practices to support meaningful and sustained learning outcomes.

References

Azahra, S., Farhana, H., Aryanto, S., & Awiria, A. (2026). Pembelajaran matematika berbasis deep learning di kelas III SDN Kebalen 01. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 13(1), 104–116. Retrieved from https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/40001

Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher's view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Brookfield, S. (2020). Teaching for critical thinking. International Journal of Adult Education and Technology, 11(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAET.2020070101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAET.2020070101

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewi, D. A. A. N., Salzabilla, V. R. F., & Amelia, R. I. (2025). Pendekatan pembelajaran deep learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berhitung untuk siswa kelas 1 sekolah dasar. JRPD (Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar), 8(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.26618/c7dbd432

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: Executive summary “The Delphi Report”. The California Academic Press. http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/DEXadobe.PDF

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF

Gwet, K. L. (2021). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (5th ed.). AgreeStat Analytics.

Halpern, D. F., & Dunn, D. S. (2022). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025412

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Lithner, J. (2015). Learning mathematics by creative or imitative reasoning. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 487–506). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_28

Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Collaborative learning and critical thinking: Testing the link. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 726–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1291257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1291257

Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Lombardi, L., Mednick, F. J., De Backer, F., & Lombaerts, K. (2021). Fostering critical thinking across the primary school's curriculum in the European schools system. Education Sciences, 11(9), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090505

Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y., Chen, O., & Ayabe, H. (2019). Showing what it looks like. In E. Manalo, Y. Uesaka, & C. Chinn (Eds.), Deeper learning, dialogic learning, and critical thinking (pp. 230–246). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323058-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323058-14

Marton, F. (1979). Learning as seen from the learner's point of view. University of Gothenburg.

Ningsi, A., & Shaleh, S. (2024). Problematika penerapan asesmen berbasis HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) di sekolah dasar. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 8(3), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v8i3.20998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v8i3.20998

Nugroho, K. U. Z., Marsehan, A., Yulianti, L. T., & Nurtiara, N. (2025). Improving students' mathematics HOTS ability through the integration of deep learning and SOLO taxonomy. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v11i2.27111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v11i2.27111

OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking competency standards. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

Roberts, J. W. (2006). Disney, Dewey, and the death of experience in education. Education and Culture, 21(2), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.7771/1559-1786.1043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1559-1786.1043

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Henningsen, M. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. Teachers College Press.

Sudiryo, S., Hartinah, S., & Susongko, P. (2024). Pengembangan asesmen higher order thinking skill (HOTS) pada mata pelajaran IPAS berbasis model Rasch tingkat sekolah dasar. Journal of Education Research, 5(3), 3849–3866. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1492

Valeyeva, E., Kupriyanov, R., Valeyeva, N., Romanova, G., & Nugmanova, D. (2017). The role of metacognitive skills in engineering education. 2017 ASEE International Forum Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--29307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--29307

Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., De Luca, F., Fernández-Barrera, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering students' creativity and critical thinking: What it means in school. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom's taxonomy revised: Understanding the new version of Bloom's taxonomy. The Second Principle, 1(1), 1–8.

Downloads

Published

28-06-2026

How to Cite

Juriana, J., Hartoyo, A., & Mardiyyaningsih, A. N. (2026). Elementary School Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices in Deep Learning Oriented Toward Critical and Creative Thinking. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 6(10), 9. https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i10.2026.9

Issue

Section

Articles