Transformasi Perguruan Tinggi: Strategi dan Teknik Mewujudkan Universitas Berkelas Dunia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i1.2026.8Keywords:
Peringkat universitas, Transformasi perguruan tinggi, Universitas berkelas dunia, Visibilitas digitalAbstract
Transformasi perguruan tinggi menuju universitas berkelas dunia merupakan isu yang relevan dan penting dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Artikel ini, melalui pendekatan penelitian kualitatif dan analisis dokumen, berupaya memberikan panduan strategis dan teknis bagi perguruan tinggi dalam perjalanannya mencapai status berkelas dunia. Strategi dan teknik yang telah berhasil diterapkan oleh universitas-universitas berkelas dunia dipelajari, dengan fokus pada tiga aspek kunci: visibilitas digital, transparansi, dan prestasi akademik. Disamping itu, artikel ini juga menyingkap potensi tantangan dan hambatan yang mungkin dihadapi selama proses transformasi, sekaligus menawarkan solusi mitigasi yang efektif. Diharapkan, panduan ini mampu memberikan wawasan berharga dan arahan praktis bagi perguruan tinggi yang tengah berjuang dalam pencapaian status berkelas dunia. Akademisi, pembuat kebijakan, dan perguruan tinggi yang sedang berusaha mencapai status tersebut, artikel ini menawarkan wawasan dalam merumuskan dan melaksanakan strategi dalam persaingan di ranah universitas berkelas dunia
References
Aguillo, I. (2009). Measuring the institution’s footprint in the web. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 540–556. doi:10.1108/073788309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/073788309
Altbach, P. G. (2013). The international imperative in higher education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-338-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-338-6
ARWU. (2021). Academic ranking of world universities methodologies. Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2021.html
ARWU. (2022). Methodology of academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved from https://www.shanghairanking.com/methodology/arwu/2022
Baty, P. (2010). The growing power of university rankings.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M. P., & Vadillo-Muñoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3), 349–365. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8
Consultancy, S. R. (2022). ARWU methodology. Retrieved from https://www.shanghairanking.com/methodology/arwu/2022
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cybermetrics Lab. (2023). Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.webometrics.info/en/methodology
Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., & Simar, L. (2015). Efficiency and economies of scale and specialization in European universities: A directional distance approach. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 430–448. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.03.002
Docampo, D. (2013). Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities results. Scientometrics, 94(2), 567–587. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0801-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0801-y
Group, S. R. (2022). SIR world report 2022: Global ranking. Retrieved from https://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php
Group, S. R. (2023). Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137446671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446671
Holmes, R. (2013). Global and regional leadership of BRICS countries. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59. doi:10.1111/ejed.12061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12061
Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2015). Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 931–949. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1614-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1614-6
Rankings, T. W. U. (2023). World university rankings 2023: Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2023-methodology
Rauhvargers, A. (2011). Global university rankings and their impact. Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.
Saisana, M., D’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165–177. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003
Scimago. (2020). Scimago institutions rankings methodology. Retrieved from https://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php
Shin, J. C., Toutkoushian, R. K., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2011). University rankings. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7
Symonds, Q. Q. (2022). QS world university rankings: Methodology. Retrieved from https://support.qs.com/hc/en-gb/articles/4405955370898-QS-World-University-Rankings
Teixeira, P. N., & Shin, J. C. (Eds.). (2020). Higher education inequality. In The international encyclopedia of higher education systems and institutions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_300313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9
Varghese, N. V., & Martin, M. (2013). Governance reforms and university autonomy in Asia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ikhwan Arief, Eko Pramudya Laksana, Mochammad Tanzil Multazam, Busro Busro, Arif Zainudin, Akhmad Anwar Dani, Andista Candra Yusro, Dedi Rahman Nur, Utama Alan Deta, Much Fuad Saifuddin, Mohammad Fauziddin, Muhamad Ratodi, Asep Erlan Maulana, Muh. Firyal Akbar, Lucky Zamzami, Aldy Rialdy Atmadja, Yuhefizar Yuhefizar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
