Ironi Cinta Sinta pada “Tanya Sinta, 3” dan “Sinta Gugat, 2” dalam Antologi Puisi Kemelut Cinta Rahwana Karya Djoko Saryono

Authors

  • Alicia Putri Pelangi Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Imanuella Anastasia Brighita Carneliaputri Dewanty Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Karkono Karkono Universitas Negeri Malang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3776-2725

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um064v2i12022p138-150

Keywords:

Irony, Love, Sinta, Ramayana

Abstract

Abstract: Irony can happen anywhere, especially when it comes to love. Love can be seen as a human perception in looking at life and the world. Love has many forms. The ideal form of partner love is Companionate Love. Based on the opinion of Sternberg (1998), to determine the form of love required three components, namely, intimacy, passion, and commitment. After the three components are properly fulfilled, Companionate Love as an ideal love can be formed. This article uses a descriptive-qualitative method. The purpose of this study is to explore more about the irony of love in the poems Tanya Sinta, 3 and Sinta Gugat, 2 with a focus on the character of Sinta. Review of analysis and interpretation of this study using components of intimacy, arousal components, and components of commitment according to Sternberg's psychological theory of love in Triangular Theory of Love (1998). The results showed that the love that Sinta had for Rama was not an ideal love. Sinta shows love in the form of Infatuated Love, which then turns into Fatuous Love so that it fails to form Companionate Love or ideal love. This is because the relationship between Sita and Rama does not fulfill the three components of love.

Keywords: irony, love, Sinta, Ramayana.

Abstrak: Ironi dapat terjadi dimanapun, terutama dalam hal cinta. Cinta dapat dipandang sebagai persepsi manusia dalam memandang kehidupan dan dunia. Cinta memiliki banyak bentuk. Bentuk cinta pasangan yang ideal adalah Companionate Love. Berdasarkan pendapat Sternberg (1998), untuk menentukan bentuk cinta diperlukan tiga komponen yaitu, keintiman, gairah, dan komitmen. Setelah tiga komponen terpenuhi dengan baik, Companionate Love sebagai cinta yang ideal dapat terbentuk. Artikel ini menggunakan metode deskriptif-kualitatif. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengupas lebih lanjut mengenai ironi cinta dalam puisi Tanya Sinta, 3 dan Sinta Gugat, 2 dengan fokus tokoh Sinta. Tinjauan analisis dan interpretasi penelitian ini menggunakan komponen keintiman, komponen gairah, dan komponen komitmen menurut teori psikologi cinta Sternberg dalam Triangular Theory of Love (1998). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa cinta yang dimiliki Sinta kepada Rama sebenarnya bukan cinta ideal. Sinta menunjukkan cinta berbentuk Infatuated Love, yang kemudian berubah menjadi Fatuous Love sehingga gagal membentuk Companionate Love atau cinta yang ideal. Hal ini disebabkan hubungan Sinta dan Rama tidak memenuhi tiga komponen cinta.

Kata kunci: ironi, cinta, Sinta, Ramayana.

Author Biography

Alicia Putri Pelangi, Universitas Negeri Malang

Student of Indonesian Departement, Universitas Negeri Malang.

References

Acker, M., & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of social and personal Relationships, 9(1), 21–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592091002

Anderson, J. W. (2016). Sternberg's Triangular Theory of Love. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of family studies (1st ed.). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs058

Hatfield, E., & Walster, G. W. (1978). A new look at love. Lanham: University Press of America.

Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Martel, L. D. (2007). Passionate love. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 760–779). New York: The Guilford Press.

Kapogianni, E. (2021) Types and definitions of irony. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levy, P. E. (2013). Industrial organizational psychology: Understanding the workplace (4th ed.). New York: Worth.

Maghfiroh, S. (2020). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar” perspektif aliran progresivisme John Dewey. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 141–147. Retrieved from https://e-journal.my.id/jsgp/article/view/248

McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464657

Pradopo, R. D. (1997). Ragam bahasa sastra. Humaniora, 4, 38–46. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/1931

Ratna, N. K. (2004). Metode dan teknik penulisan sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Saks, M.J., & Krupat, E. (1988). Social psychology and its application. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

Saragih J. I. (2006). Bentuk-bentuk cinta berdasarkan Triangular Theory of Love (Undergraduate paper, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.) Retrieved from http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/1905

Sartre, Z. W.. (2021). Keberadaan cinta dalam buku kumpulan puisi Hujan Bulan Juni karya Sapardi Djoko Damono. In Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia, Meneroka Sapardi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Saryono, D. (2015). Kemelut Cinta Rahwana: Himpunan puisi. Malang: Penerbit Pelangi Sastra.

Sasmita, M. B. A., Dermawan, T. (2021). Demitefikasi tokoh Rahwana dalam kumpulan puisi Kemelut Cinta Rahwana karya Djoko Saryono: Tinjauan estetika resepsi. JoLLA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts, 1(7), 2021, 943–957. doi: https://doi.org/10.17977/um064v1i72021p943-957

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cupid's arrow: The course of love through time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Toward a triangular theory of love for one’s musical instrument. Psychology of Music, 49(6), 1747–1757. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620961143

Suharsaputra, U, (2012). Metode penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan tindakan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Van Buskirk, S. L. (2018). Triangular love: 'Not much more than G' (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at San Antonio). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2158353973?accountid=13360

Downloads

Published

2022-01-25

How to Cite

Pelangi, A. P., Dewanty, I. A. B. C., & Karkono, K. (2022). Ironi Cinta Sinta pada “Tanya Sinta, 3” dan “Sinta Gugat, 2” dalam Antologi Puisi Kemelut Cinta Rahwana Karya Djoko Saryono. JoLLA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Arts, 2(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.17977/um064v2i12022p138-150

Issue

Section

Articles