Efek Latar Lingkungan Belajar terhadap Capaian Akademik Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um070v4i122024p580-590Keywords:
learning achievement, learning environment, elementary school students, mathematicsAbstract
Based on PISA 2022 data, as many as 82% of participating countries, including Indonesia, experienced a decline in mathematics competency scores. In Indonesia, around 71% of students do not achieve minimum competency in mathematics, and 81.67% of elementary school students have below-average mathematical problem-solving abilities. One of the factors that hinders student learning achievement is boredom. Previous research has shown that creating a new and interactive learning environment can reduce boredom. Therefore, this study aims to identify the effectiveness of indoor and outdoor learning environments on elementary school students' academic achievement in mathematics. This study uses an experimental quantitative design with a two-group matched independent measure approach to compare the two learning environments, namely indoor and outdoor environments. The results showed no significant difference between indoor and outdoor learning environments on students' academic achievement. Statistical analysis produced a t value of 0.307 and a Sig value (2-tailed) of 0.760 (p> 0.05), which means that both learning environments have the same effect on students' academic achievement in mathematics. These findings indicate that the learning environment, both indoor and outdoor, does not significantly affect elementary school students' learning outcomes in mathematics.
Abstrak
Berdasarkan data PISA 2022, sebanyak 82% negara peserta, termasuk Indonesia, mengalami penurunan skor kompetensi matematika. Di Indonesia, sekitar 71% siswa tidak mencapai kompetensi minimum dalam matematika, dan 81,67%, siswa SD memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis di bawah rata-rata. Salah satu faktor yang menghambat capaian belajar siswa adalah kebosanan. Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa menciptakan lingkungan belajar baru dan interaktif dapat mengurangi kebosanan. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi efektivitas lingkungan belajar indoor dan outdoor terhadap capaian akademik matematika siswa SD. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kuantitatif eksperimental dengan pendekatan two-group matched independent measure untuk membandingkan antara lingkungan indoor dan outdoor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan signifikan antara lingkungan belajar indoor dan outdoor terhadap capaian akademik siswa. Analisis statistik menghasilkan nilai t sebesar 0.307 dan nilai Sig (2-tailed) sebesar 0.760 (p > 0.05), yang berarti kedua lingkungan belajar memiliki efek yang sama terhadap capaian akademik matematika siswa. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa lingkungan belajar, baik indoor maupun outdoor tidak secara signifikan mempengaruhi hasil belajar siswa SD dalam mata pelajaran matematika.
References
Azwar, S. (2010). Tes prestasi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.
Ang, R. P., & Huan, V. S. (2006). Academic Expectations Stress Inventory: Development, Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 522-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282461
Cassidy, S. (2012). Exploring individual differences as determining factors in student academic achievement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 793 - 810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.545948.
Cayubit, R. (2021). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25, 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x.
Chan, T., & Dai, M. (2023). Factors Influencing Academic Achievement of University Students. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2023.3.2.2
Eisner, E. W. (1979). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. New York: Macmillan.
Ewell, P. B. (2005). Assessment: A Key to Student Learning. In P. B. Ewell & J. E. Paulson (Eds.), Assessment: A Key to Student Learning (pp. 1-12). St. Louis, MO: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Gagné, R. M. (1974). Essentials of Learning for Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gilav, A. (2016). Investigating the Impact of Environmental Factors on Learning and Academic Achievement of Elementary Students: Review. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 5, 360-369.
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2003). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth.
Hamidah & Chotimah, S. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Van Hiele terhadap kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah UPT P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 2(2), 203-208.
Hidayat, P. A., & Nuraini, R. (2022). Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Perpangkatan dan Bentuk Akar secara Daring pada Masa Covid-19 di Desa Jagaraya. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika : PowerMathEdu, 1(2), 183-192.
Hidayatulloh, I., Kurniati, & Maimunah. (2023) Karakteristik Pembelajaran Siswa Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Proceeding SEMNAS-TP (Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan), 3 (1), 123-127.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.
Jing-lan, L. (2004). Cause and Countermeasure for Middle School Students' Boring in Study. Journal of Gannan Teacher's College.
Kaffenberger, M. (2019, May 15). Why Are Indonesian Students Getting Worse at Mathematics? RISE Programme. Retrieved November 7, 2024, from https://riseprogramme.org/blog/indonesian_students_worse_mathematics.htm
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2023). PISA 2022 dan Pemulihan Pembelajaran di Indonesia.
Kenedi, A., Helsa, Y., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Hendri, S. (2019). Mathematical Connection of Elementary School Students To Solve Mathematical Problems. Journal on Mathematics
Education. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.10.1.5416.69-80.
Lee, J., & Shute, V. (2010). Personal and Social-Contextual Factors in K–12 Academic Performance: An Integrative Perspective on Student Learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 185 - 202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.493471.
Maina, J., & Ibrahim., R. (2019). Socialisation Mediates The Relationship Between Learning Environments and Architecture Students' Academic Performance. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v6.n3.416.
Mann, S., & Robinson, A. (2009). Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802042911.
Moos, R. (1973). Conceptualization of human environments. American Psychologist, 28, 652–665.
Narsih, N., Sappaile, B., & Nasrullah, N. (2022). The Relationship between Learning Concentration and Student Emotional Maturity to Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Class X Students of High School. SAINSMAT: Journal of Applied Sciences, Mathematics, and Its Education. https://doi.org/10.35877/sainsmat427.
Novianti, R. (2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Tingkat Konsentrasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak di MAN 2 Palembang. Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah 1(1), 1-20.
Nurdianti, N., Halidin, H., & Farman, F. (2021). Pengaruh Minat dan Lingkungan Belajar Peserta Didik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Faktor: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 8(1), 20-28.
Nyström, A., Jackson, C., & Karlsson, M. (2019). What counts as success? Constructions of achievement in prestigious higher education programmes. Research Papers in Education, 34, 465 - 482. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452964.
Ole, A. A., & Dipan, E. G. (2023). Hubungan kondisi lingkungan belajar di sekolah dan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(1), 71-78.
Yamin, R. (2014) Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran: sebagai Referensi Bagi Pendidik dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran yang Efektif dan Berkualitas. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Zawodniak, J., & Pasikowski, S. (2020). Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners. System, 91, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102259.
Prawidia, I., & Khusna, H. (2021). Pengaruh suasana lingkungan belajar dan minat belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 14(2), 192-207.
Prøitz, T. S. (2010). Learning Outcomes: What Are They? Who Defines Them? When and Where Are They Defined?. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(2), 119–137. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-010-9097-8
Rui, B. (2007). The Investigation Report of the Students Who Were Bored with Study. Journal of Hebei Energy Institute of Vocation and Technology.
Sharp, J.G., Hemmings, B., Kay, R., Murphy, B., Elliott, S. (2016). Academic boredom among students in higher education: A mixed-methods exploration of characteristics, contributors and consequences.
Tam, K., Tilburg, W., & Chan, C. (2022). Whatever will bore, will bore: The mere anticipation of boredom exacerbates its occurrence in lectures. The British journal of educational psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12549.
Tam, K., Poon, C., Hui, V., Wong, C., Kwong, V., Yuen, G., & Chan, C. (2020). Boredom begets boredom: An experience sampling study on the impact of teacher boredom on student boredom and motivation. The British journal of educational psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12309
Tanner, C. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010373598.
Tian, H., & Sun, Z. (2018). Historical Development of Academic Achievement Assessment., 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56198-0_1.
Wuthrich, V.M., Jagiello, T. & Azzi, V. Academic Stress in the Final Years of School: A Systematic Literature Review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 51, 986–1015 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-00981-y
Wuryanto, H., & Abduh, M. (2023). Mengkaji Kembali Hasil PISA sebagai Pendekatan Inovasi Pembelajaran untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Literasi dan Numerasi. Direktorat Guru Pendidikan Dasar. https://gurudikdas.kemdikbud.go.id/news/mengkaji-kembali-hasil-pisa-sebagai-pendekatan-inovasi
-pembelajaran--untuk-peningkatan-kompetensi-li. Diakses pada 02 November 2024.
Yang, X., Zhao, X., Tian, X., & Xing, B. (2020). Effects of environment and posture on the concentration and achievement of students in mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29, 400 - 413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1707692.
Yakobi, O., Boylan, J., & Danckert, J. (2021). Behavioral and electroencephalographic evidence for reduced attentional control and performance monitoring in boredom. Psychophysiology, e13816. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13816.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maulana Rizky, Puan Sayidina Massayu Kinanthi, Rafi Raihan Aziz, Ramdhaniyya, Yaumul Rahmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)
