Validitas Konstruk Alat Ukur College Academic Self-efficacy Scale pada Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um070v4i102024p504-510Keywords:
academic self-efficacy, College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, factor analysisAbstract
Academic self-efficacy refers to an individual's ability to engage in learning activities to achieve academic goals. Measuring academic self-efficacy among students is necessary to gain an overview of the self-efficacy they possess and to identify appropriate intervention steps to support academic success. There are several instruments for measuring academic self-efficacy, one of which is the College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES). This instrument was adapted into Indonesian in 2022, but its measurement has been limited to content validity. This study aims to re-examine the construct validity of the adapted CASES measure to determine whether each factor aligns with the cultural context. The testing will be conducted through a quantitative research design. The sampling technique will use purposive sampling with a total sample of 116 respondents, who are active students at universities in Indonesia. Data analysis will utilize the JASP application to perform Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Psychometric results indicate that the adapted CASES has not achieved a fit model. This suggests that the CASES measure still needs further development.
Abstrak
Efikasi diri akademik adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki individu untuk menjalankan aktivitas belajar untuk mencapai tujuan akademik. Pengukuran terkait efikasi akademik di kalangan mahasiswa diperlukan agar membantu melihat gambaran efikasi akademik yang dimiliki mahasiswa serta untuk mengindentifikasi langkah intervensi yang tepat dalam menunjang keberhasilan akademik. Terdapat beberapa instrumen untuk pengukuran academic self-esteem, salah satunya College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES). Instrumen tersebut telah diadaptasi ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia pada tahun 2022, namun masih terbatas pada pengukuran validitas isi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji kembali validitas konstruk dari alat ukur CASES yang telah diadaptasi agar diketahui setiap faktor yang ada sesuai konteks budaya. Pengujian dilakukan melalui desain penelitian kuantitatif. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling dengan jumlah sampel 116 responden yang merupakan mahasiswa aktif di universitas di Indonesia. Analisis data menggunakan aplikasi JASP untuk melakukan Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Hasil psikometri menunjukkan bahwa CASES yang telah diadaptasi belum mendaptkan model yang fit. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa alat ukur CASES masih perlu untuk dikembangkan lebih lanjut.
References
Akbar-Hawadi, R. (2006). Akselarasi: A-Z Informasi Program Percepatan Belajar dan Anak Berbakat Intelektual. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Al Mutir, A. (2015). Student Choice in Continuing to Study High School Science.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press.
Bariyyah, K. (2015). The Effectiveness of Peer-Helping to Reduce Academic-Stress of Students. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 14(4), 176–181.
Clemons, T.L. (2008). Underachieving gifted students: A social cognitive model. The National Research Centre on The Gifted and talented. University of Virginia.
Fasikhah, S. S., & Fatimah, S. (2013). Self-regulated learning (SRL) dalam meningkatkan prestasi akademik pada mahasiswa. Jurnal ilmiah psikologi terapan, 1(1), 145-155.
Hair, J. F., Jr. et al. (2008) Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading. (4th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International Inc.
Haripoernomo,T. (2003). Hubungan prestasi akademik, kematangan siswa dan kinerja siswa dalam praktek industri dengan kesiapan terhadap dunia kerja pada SMK Kota Malang. Thesis, tidak diterbitkan. Program Pascasarjana IKIP Malang.
Hartono, S. & Muchtar, D. Y. (2017). Uji Validitas Konstruk pada Instrumen dengan Metode Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), 6(1), 79-86.
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The Influence Of Academic Self-Efficacy on Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
Ifdil, I., Bariyyah, K., Dewi, A. K., & Rangka, I. B., (2019). The College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES); An Indonesian Validation to Measure the Self-Efficacy on Student. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 4(4), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v4i42019p115
Klassen, R. M., Krawchuk, L. L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 915–931.
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. (6th Ed). USA: Pearson Education Inc.
Margono, S. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Owen, S. V., & Froman, R. D. (1988). Development of A College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale.
Putri, C.N.S,, Noviekayati, I., & Rina, A.P. (2022). Prestasi belajar akademik pada mahasiswa: Bagaimana peranan manajemen waktu?. INNER: Journal of Psychological Research, 2(3), 510-518.
Rorer, L. G. (1965). The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin, 63(3), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021888
Santrock, J.W. (2008). Educational psychology. University of Texas at Dallas, New York : McGraw-Hill International Edition.
Sari, K. D. S. K., Putri, A. M. A. A., & Ganjarwati, R. (2022). Academic Self-Efficacy pada Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Malang. Tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Shikalepoh, P. P. (2016). Learners’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Reading Comprehension in English Second Additional Language In A Namibian Rural School. (Doctoral Dissertation) North-West University (South Africa), Potchefstroom Campus.
Sufirmansyah. (2015). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Prodi PAI STAIN Kediri dengan Motivasi sebagai Variabel Intervening. Didaktika Religia, 3 (2): 141.
Sukemi & Trisnawati. (2021). Analisis Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) dan Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) pada Pengembangan Instrumen Motivasi Belajar Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Abacus, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59605/abacus.v2i2.220
Syukri, I. I. F., Rizal, S. S., & Al Hamdani, M. D. (2019). Pengaruh kegiatan keagamaan terhadap kualitas pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 17.
Tarumasely, Y. (2021). Pengaruh Self Regulated Learning dan Self-Efficacy terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(1), 71.
Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. https://matematohir.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/hasil-pisa-indonesia-tahun-2018-turun-dibanding-tahun-2015/
Widarjono. A. (2010). Analisis Statistika Multivariat Terapan. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Willson–Conrad, A., & Kowalske, M.G, (2017). Self-efficacy beliefs to understand how students in a general
chemistry course approach the exam process. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1).
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00073A
Yuliyani, R., Handayani, S. D., & Somawati. (2017). Peran Efikasi Diri (Self-Efficacy) dan Kemampuan Berpikir Positif terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 7(2), 130-143.
Zagoto, S. F. L. (2019). Efikasi Diri dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(2), 386.
Ziegler, M., MaaB, U., Griffith, R., & Gammon, A. (2015). What is the nature of taking? Modeling distinct response patterns and quantitative differences in faking at the same time. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 679-703.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25,82–91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tiara Dewi Musyafirah, Usagi Alifa Tira, Vinka Rosalia, Zahyrina Akhsanti Fajriyah, Femmi Nurmalitasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)
