Mengapa Orang Mengunggah Isu Pemilu Di Media Sosial?: Motivasi Trolling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um070v2i72022p512-521Keywords:
isu; motivasi; media sosial, trollingAbstract
Abstract: We live in the age of technological abundance in the twenty-first century. The arrival of networked digital machines and information flow is slowly but steadily shaping practically every aspect of our daily lives. Social media platforms, for example, provide a new mode of communication that allows users to engage in discussions and exchange opinions on a variety of topics, fostering global dialogue. As is happening in today's politics, social media is a dangerous threat to democracy and pluralism. Social media, as it is in today's politics, is a dangerous threat to democracy and pluralism. We are witnessing the birth of a new political language game, with trolling as one of the primary moves, as a result of the rise of social media. Social media not only poses a unique threat to local politics but also global peace and stability. The purpose of this study is to explain why trolls spread rumors on social media. This study was conducted on netizens who actively engaged in trolling behavior. We used a qualitative paradigm with a phenomenological approach to investigate the role of motivation in trolling behavior to share substantiated and unsubstantiated content of the Indonesian election. Results show that trolling is motivated by two factors, according to the findings: intrinsic motivation (i.e. problem-solving, education, and seeking attention, as well as supporting social factors) (i.e. environment and timing).
Abstrak: Di abad ke-21, kita hidup di era teknologi yang berkembang sangat cepat. Keberadaan media digital dan informasi perlahan namun pasti memengaruhi hampir setiap elemen dari kehidupan kita sehari-hari. Misalnya, platform media sosial memberikan bentuk pola komunikasi baru yang memungkinkan seseorang terlibat dalam diskusi dan bertukar pendapat tentang berbagai topik. Kemudahan dalam berkomunikasi ini menciptakan dialog pada skala global. Seperti dalam politik kontemporer yang terjadi saat ini, media sosial adalah ancaman berbahaya yang dapat disalahgunakan untuk demokrasi dan pluralisme. Dengan maraknya media sosial, muncul permainan bahasa politik baru, salah satunya disebut dengan trolling. Fokus penelitian ini adalah mengeksplor motivasi troll yang membagikan informasi dan rumor di media sosial. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada netizen yang berpartisipasi aktif dalam perilaku trolling. Untuk mengeksplorasi peran motivasi perilaku trolling untuk berbagi konten pemilu Indonesia, kami menggunakan paradigma kualitatif dengan pendekatan fenomenologis. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa faktor yang memotivasi netizen melakukan trolling yakni motivasi intrinsik yang meliputi topik yang menarik, memenuhi kebutuhan emosional dan kebutuhan kognitif, motivasi ekstrinsik yang meliputi problem solving, education, dan mencari perhatian, serta faktor sosial pendukung yang meliputi lingkungan dan waktu.
References
Baston, R., & Kenyah-Damptey, B. (2020). Unintentional Trolling: How Subjects Express Their Prejudices Through Made-up Stories. Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00425-4
Binns, A. (2012). Don’t Feed The Trolls!: Managing troublemakers in magazines’ online communities. Journalism Practice, 6(4), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.648988
Bishop, J. (2013). The effect of de-individuation of the Internet Troller on Criminal Procedure implementation: An interview with a Hater. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7, 28–48. https://www.cybercrimejournal.com/Bishop2013janijcc.pdf
Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L. (1998). Rumor Rest Stops on the Information Highway Transmission Patterns in a Computer-Mediated Rumor Chain. Human Communication Research, 25(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00441.x
Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
Cheng, J., Bernstein, M., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW ’17, 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998213
Coles, B. A., & West, M. (2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070
Craker, N., & March, E. (2016). The dark side of Facebook®: The Dark Tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.043
Cruz, A. G. B., Seo, Y., & Rex, M. (2018). Trolling in online communities: A practice-based theoretical perspective. The Information Society, 34(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391909
Fichman, P., & Sanfilippo, M. R. (2015). The Bad Boys and Girls of Cyberspace: How Gender and Context Impact Perception of and Reaction to Trolling. Social Science Computer Review, 33(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314533169
Fichman, P., & Sanfilippo, M. R. (2016). Online Trolling And Its Perpetrators: Under The Cyberbridge (1st Edition). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=5ebad77d4214c6d431ec102deafe5789
Golf-Papez, M., & Veer, E. (2017). Don’t feed the trolling: Rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15–16), 1336–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1383298
Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Adolescent trolling in online environments: A brief overview. Education and Health, 32, 85–87. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/25950/1/221474_PubSub2968_Griffiths.pdf
Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011
Herdiansyah, H. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Ilmu Psikologi. Salemba Humanika.
Hong, F.-Y., & Cheng, K.-T. (2018). Correlation between university students’ online trolling behavior and online trolling victimization forms, current conditions, and personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.016
Hopkinson, C. (2013). Trolling in Online Discussions: From Provocation to Community-building. Brno Studies in English, 39(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2013-1-1
Jane, E. A. (2015). Flaming? What flaming? The pitfalls and potentials of researching online hostility. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9362-0
Marett, K., & Joshi, K. D. (2009). The Decision to Share Information and Rumors: Examining the Role of Motivation in an Online Discussion Forum. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 48–67. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02404
Mocanu, D., Rossi, L., Zhang, Q., Karsai, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1198–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.024
Nycyk, M. (2017). Trolls and Trolling: An Exploration of Those That Live Under the Internet Bridge. Michael Nycyk.
Phillips, W. (2015). This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. The MIT Press. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=15B170EE402E6B1849D9B753581FDB08
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sanfilippo, M. R., Fichman, P., & Yang, S. (2018). Multidimensionality of online trolling behaviors. The Information Society, 34(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391911
Seigfried-Spellar, K. C., & Lankford, C. M. (2018). Personality and online environment factors differ for posters, trolls, lurkers, and confessors on Yik Yak. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 54–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.047
Sest, N., & March, E. (2017). Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.038
Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2010). Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510365390
Shugars, S., & Beauchamp, N. (2019). Why Keep Arguing? Predicting Engagement in Political Conversations Online. SAGE Open, 9(1), 215824401982885. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019828850
Syuhada, K. (2017). Etika Media di Era “Post-Truth”. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, V, 75–79. http://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/jkmi/article/viewFile/8789/pdf
Thacker, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). An Exploratory Study of Trolling in Online Video Gaming: International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 2(4), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2012100102
Tsantarliotis, P., Pitoura, E., & Tsaparas, P. (2017). Defining and predicting troll vulnerability in online social media. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 7(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-017-0445-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)


