HUBUNGAN KEPRIBADIAN BIG FIVE DENGAN PERILAKU BERKENDARA BERISIKO PENGENDARA MOTOR SISWA SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um070v2i42022p291-297Keywords:
Perilaku Berkendara Berisiko, Kepribadian, Big Five InventoryAbstract
Abstract: This research aims to determine the role of personality on risky driving behavior of high school students. This study is important to do, because the attitude of the motorbike rider causes a lot of traffic accidents. Data collection using the risky driving behavior scale from Iversen (2004) which has been adapted into Indonesian by Alfazi (2018) consists of 24 items. All items are valid with a validity value of 0.309–0.778 and a reliability of 0.688. Personality instrument uses Extra-Short Big Five Iventory-2 by Soto and John (2017) which has been adapted by Tresnawaty and Izdihar (2020) which consists of 15 items. The validity shows a value of 0.318–0.47 with a reliability of 0.611. The sample is 119 students of SMAN 1 Ngunut Tulungagung, grades 10-12 who rode motorbikes and distributed questionnaires using google form. Data analysis using multiple regression, previously tested for normality, linearity, and heteroscedasticity. The results of hypothesis testing show that personality is a predictor of risky driving behavior. However, when viewed pertrait, only agreeableness and neuroticism significantly affect risky driving behavior. Meanwhile, openness to experience, conscientiousness and extraversion are not significant.
Abstrak: Tujuan pelaksanaan penelitiaan ini yakni untuk mengetahui peran kepribadian terhadap perilaku berkendara yang beresiko siswa SMAN. Penelitian ini penting untuk dilakukan, karena sikap pengemudi motor mengakibatkan banyak terjadi kecelakaan lalu lintas. Pengambilan data menggunakan skala risk driving behavior dari Iversen (2004) yang telah diadaptasi kedalam bahhasa Indonesia oleh Alfazi (2018) terdiri dari 24 aitem. Semua aitem valid dengan nilai validitas 0.309–0.778 dan reliabilitas 0.688. Instrumen kepribadian menggunakan Extra-Short Big Five Iventory-2 oleh Soto dan John (2017) yang telah diadaptasi oleh Tresnawaty dan Izdihar (2020) yang terdiri dari 15 aitem. Uji validitas menunjukkan nilai 0.318–0.47 dengan reliabilitas sebasar 0.611. Sampel 119 siswa SMAN 1 Ngunut Tulungagung, kelas 10-12 yang mengendarai sepeda motor dan penyebaran kuesioner menggunakan google form. Analisis data menggunakan Spearman Brown, karena saat dilakukan uji normalitas data tidak normasl. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan tingkat signifikansi dibawah 0.05 (0.04<0.05), maka ada hubungan positif antara perilaku berkendara beresiko dengan neuroticism dan agreeableness, sedangkan hubungan opennes to experience, conscientiousness dan extraversion dengan perilaku berkendara beresiko tidak signifikan
References
Agung, I. M. (2014). Model perilaku pengendara berisiko pada remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 2(2), 35-41.
Alfazi. 2018. Hubungan Antara Sikap Pengambilan Resiko Dan Perilaku Mengemudi Berisiko Pada Mahasiswa. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia
Amalia, N. 2020. Perilaku Berisiko dalam Berkendara dan Kejadian Kecelakaan Sepeda Motor pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Kesehatan. Vol. 3 No. 4. 273-286.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Perkembangan Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Jenis, 1949-2017. Badan Pusat Staatistik (online), https://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/i
d/1133.
Bagaskara, S. (2017). Perbandingan perilaku mengemudi berisiko antara pengemudi mobil dan pengendara sepeda motor dan kaitannya dengan faktor-faktor kepribadian. Jurnal Transportasi, 17(2).
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Widiger, T. A., Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five-factor model.
Dahlen, E. R., & White, R. P. (2006). The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Personality and individual differences, 41(5), 903-915.
Evans, L. (2004). Traffic Safety Science Serving Society: Bloomfield Hills. Science Serving Society.
Feist, Jess and Feist, Gregory J. (2010). Teori Kepribadian, Edisi 7. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford Press.
Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 135-150.
Izhidar, D. F., & Tresnawaty, Y. (2020). Menghitung Pengaruh Agreeableness-Extraversion Terhadap Kesehatan Mental: Studi Kasus Pada Volunteer. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Psikologi: Kajian Empiris & Non-Empiris, 6(2), 33-41.
Machin, M. A., & Sankey, K. S. (2008). Relationships between young drivers’ personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. Accident analysis & prevention, 40(2), 541-547.
Sari, S. 2020. Big Five Personality Dengan Perilaku mengemudi Berisiko Pada Young Adult Pengendara Motor. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya).
Schwebel, D. C., Severson, J., Ball, K. K., & Rizzo, M. (2006). Individual difference factors in risky driving: The roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(4), 801-810.
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69-81.
Weiten, W. (2013). Psychology: Themes and variations. Cengage Learning.
Yilmaz, V., & Çelik, H. E. (2006). Risky driving attitudes and self-reported traffic violations among Turkish drivers: The case of Eskişehir. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(1), 127-138.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)
