Radiobiological And Clinical Comparison of Single-Session Versus Hypofractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Medically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia

Authors

  • Mohammed Hassan Alewi Consultant Neurosurgeon, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Siham Sabah Abdullah Consultant Neurosurgeon, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Moneer Khammas Faraj Consultant Neurosurgeon, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v6i22026p5

Keywords:

Trigeminal Neuralgia, Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Hypofractionation, Biologically Effective Dose, EQD2, Pain Control

Abstract

Background: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a well-established treatment modality for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Although single-fraction treatment remains the conventional standard, recent technological developments have enabled hypofractionated delivery. The biological and clinical implications of these alternative fractionation schedules remain insufficiently characterized. Objective: To compare the radiobiological, dosimetric, and clinical outcomes of single-session and hypofractionated GKRS in patients with medically refractory TN. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 62 patients treated with GKRS between January and June 2026. Forty patients underwent conventional single-session treatment (80 Gy in one fraction), while 22 patients received hypofractionated treatment (20 Gy in four fractions). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Pain Intensity and Facial Hypesthesia scales at baseline and during 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Biologically effective dose (BED) and equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) were calculated using the linear–quadratic model. Results: Both treatment approaches resulted in significant reductions in pain severity during follow-up (p < 0.001). At six months, successful pain control (BNI ≤ IIIb) was achieved in 72.5% of the single-session cohort and 77.3% of the hypofractionated cohort (p = 0.914). Single-session GKRS generated substantially higher target BED and EQD2 values (p < 0.001), whereas hypofractionation significantly reduced brainstem BED and EQD2 (p < 0.001). Despite these radiobiological differences, no significant between-group differences were observed in pain response, complete pain relief, or treatment-related numbness. Conclusions: Hypofractionated GKRS achieved pain outcomes comparable to conventional single-session treatment while significantly decreasing radiobiological exposure to the brainstem. These findings suggest that hypofractionation may provide an effective treatment alternative with enhanced normal tissue sparing. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to validate these observations. 

References

Al-Harbi, K. S. (2012). Treatment-resistant depression: Therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions. Patient Preference and Adherence, 2012, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S29716

Brown, J. M., Carlson, D. J., & Brenner, D. J. (2014). The tumor radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: Are more than the 5 Rs involved? International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics, 88(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.022

Bush, A., Vallow, L., Ruiz-Garcia, H., Herchko, S., Reimer, R., Ko, S., ... & Trifiletti, D. M. (2021). Mask-based immobilization in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 83, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.033

Elsayed, O. H., Ercis, M., Pahwa, M., & Singh, B. (2022). Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression: Therapeutic Trends, Challenges and Future Directions. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 18, 2715–2729. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S273503

Faraj, M., & Alazawy, N. (2025). From physics to practice Gamma Knife radiosurgery and its evolution in Iraq (1st ed., Vol. 1). Independently published. https://www.amazon.com/Physics-Practice-Gamma-Radiosurgery-Evolution/dp/B0FNR697D1

Faraj, M. K., Alazawy, N. M., Madlool, S. K., & Ismail, M. (2025). Navigating precision: Anatomical insights into the efficacy of masks versus stereotactic frames in icon gamma knife treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. Surgical Neurology International, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_757_2024

Faraj, M. K., Naji, N. A., & Alazawy, N. M. (2018). The efficiency of the prescribed dose of the gamma knife for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery, 14, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2018.05.017

Fowler, J. F. (2010). 21 years of Biologically Effective Dose. The British Journal of Radiology, 83(991), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/31372149

Joiner, M. C., & van der Kogel, A. J. (Eds.). (2018). Basic clinical radiobiology (5th ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429490606

Joiner, M. C., & van der Kogel, A. J. (2025). Basic clinical radiobiology (6th ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003278337

Lee, B. K. Y., Zhang, J., Cho-Lim, J. J., Inouye, W., & Lee, S. P. H. (2020). Normal tissue sparing via adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancers: Analysis with biologically effective dose distributions. International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics, 106(5), 1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.233

Lee, S., & Lee, J. I. (2022). Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: Review and update. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 65(5), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0303

Madlool, S. A., Abdullah, S. S., Alabedi, H. H., Alazawy, N., Al-Musawi, M. J., Saad, D., ... & Faraj, M. K. (2020). Optimum treatment planning technique evaluation for synchronous bilateral breast cancer with left side supraclavicular lymph nodes. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 17(6), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.49211.1791

Mohammed, N., Alazawy, A., Almusawi, M. S., Alabedi, H. H., & Faraj, M. K. (2024). Gamma Knife versus Volumetric Arc Modulated Therapy in a linear accelerator in treatment of multiple brain metastasis: Literature review. Pioneering Medical Sciences, 13(2), 93–100.

Naish, M. G., Al-Sudani, T., Sami, S., & Alazawy, N. M. (2025). Comparative study of gamma knife treatment between patients with metastasis and meningioma using the efficiency index. Immunopathologia Persa, 11(1), e40123.

Regis, J., Tuleasca, C., Resseguier, N., Carron, R., Donnet, A., Gaudart, J., ... & Levivier, M. (2016). Long-term safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery in classical trigeminal neuralgia: A 497-patient historical cohort study. Journal of Neurosurgery, 124(4), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.2.JNS142144

Sheehan, J., Pan, H. C., Stroila, M., & Steiner, L. (2005). Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: Outcomes and prognostic factors. Journal of Neurosurgery, 102(3), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.3.0434

Sheehan, J. P., & Lunsford, L. D. (Eds.). (2022). Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (3rd ed.). CRC Press.

Sminia, P., Guipaud, O., Viktorsson, K., Ahire, V., Baatout, S., Boterberg, T., ... & Widmark, A. (2023). Clinical radiobiology for radiation oncology. In Radiobiology Textbook (pp. 115–148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18810-7_5

Tuleasca, C., Faouzi, M., Maeder, P., Maire, R., Knisely, J., & Levivier, M. (2021). Biologically effective dose correlates with linear tumor volume changes after upfront single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgical Review, 44(6), 3335–3344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01538-w

Downloads

Published

06-07-2026

How to Cite

Alewi, M. H. ., Abdullah, S. S. ., & Faraj, M. K. . (2026). Radiobiological And Clinical Comparison of Single-Session Versus Hypofractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Medically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia. Jurnal MIPA Dan Pembelajarannya, 6(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v6i22026p5

Issue

Section

Articles