Effect Of Some Bean Cultivars Phaseolus Vulgaris L. In The Greenhouse on Anatomical Characteristics

Authors

  • Abrar A. Naser Department of Horticulture and Landscape , Tikrit university , Tikrit , Iraq
  • Wathik A. Aziz Mesopotamia general Seed Company , Ministry of Agriculture , Baghdad , Iraq.
  • Ammar H. Saeed Department of Horticulture and Landscape , Tikrit university , Tikrit , Iraq

Keywords:

Bean Cultivars, Nano Zinc Oxide, Anatomical Traits

Abstract

The experiment was taken place at the Horticulture and Landscape Engineering Department, Tikrit University, Greenhouse Unit during the period of 2022–2023 growing season to study the effect of four bean cultivars on anatomical traits. The results revealed significant differences among the cultivars. The results showed Gia Bean cultivar outperformed the others in terms of cuticle thickness on both the upper and lower leaf surfaces, as well as epidermal cell dimensions on the upper surface. Meanwhile, the Seychelles cultivar showed greater values  in epidermal cell thickness (upper and lower surfaces), mesophyll tissue thickness, stomatal dimensions on both surfaces, and lower surface epidermal cell dimensions, in addition to having the highest stomatal frequency on the lower surface and the Ferrari cultivar was differentiated by the highest stomatal frequency on the upper surface.

References

Al-Hujairi, J. K. O. (2020). The effect of the method of adding to different levels of metal and chelated iron in some morphological, physiological and anatomical indicators of Moringa oleifera Lam plant (Master’s thesis). University of Baghdad.

Al-Mashhadani, A. H. (1992). Anatomical study of some species in Iraq and some techniques for plant anatomy (Master’s thesis). University of Baghdad.

Al-Mayah, A. A. (1983). The taxonomy of Terminalia (Combretaceae) and related genera (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester.

Allen, D. J., & Lenne, J. M. (1998). The pathology of food and pasture legumes. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).

Almeida Silva, M., et al. (2024). Anatomical and physiological adaptations in common bean cultivars subjected to water stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11234-8

Bueno, P. M. C., & Vendrame, W. A. (2024). Wavelength and light intensity affect macro- and micronutrient uptake, stomata number, and plant morphology of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plants, 13(3), 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13030441

Dilcher, D. L. (1974). Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. The Botanical Review, 40, 1–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860067

Esau, K. (1965). Plant anatomy (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Farooq, M., et al. (2023). Structural and anatomical modifications in Phaseolus vulgaris under abiotic stress conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1187421

Hazaa, A. R., & Naser, A. A. (2026). The effect of three types of organic fertilizer on some yield characteristics of two varieties of cucumber plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 17. https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v17.4394

Johnson, A. C. (1940). Microscopic preparation in plant tissues. Botanical Journal of American Union Press.

Kaplan, L., & Lynch, T. F. (1999). Phaseolus (Fabaceae) in archaeology: AMS radiocarbon dates and their significance for pre-Columbian agriculture. Economic Botany, 53, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866636

Khalid, A., Mir, A. K., Mushtaq, A., Muhammad, Z., & Zulqarnia. (2009). Morpho-palynological and leaf epidermal anatomy of 196 weeds of District Tank (N.W.F.P.), Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 15(4), 309–320.

Kumar, R., et al. (2022). Comparative anatomical traits in drought tolerant and susceptible common bean genotypes. South African Journal of Botany, 146, 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.11.019

Sadeghi, H., Shekafandeh, A., & Pessarakli, M. (2023). Leaf anatomical responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars under drought stress conditions. Plant Physiology Reports, 28, 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-023-00742-1

Sass, J. E. (1958). Botanical microtechnique (3rd ed.). Iowa State University Press.

Soltis, D. E., et al. (2018). Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 years of progress. American Journal of Botany, 105, 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1138

Stace, C. A. (1980). Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Botany, 4(1), 3–78.

Stenglein, S. A., Arambarri, A. M., Vizgarra, O. N., & Balatti, P. A. (2004). Micromorphological variability of leaf epidermis in Mesoamerican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Australian Journal of Botany, 52(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT03062

Susetyarini, E., Wahyono, P., Latifa, R., & Nurrohman, E. (2020). The identification of morphological and anatomical structures of Pluchea indica. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012040

Tabatabaiepour, S. Z., et al. (2023). Effect of redroot pigweed interference on antioxidant enzyme and light response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depends on cultivars and growth stages. Scientific Reports, 13, 4289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31466-2

Downloads

Published

31-05-2026

How to Cite

Naser, A. A. ., Aziz, W. A. ., & Saeed, A. H. . (2026). Effect Of Some Bean Cultivars Phaseolus Vulgaris L. In The Greenhouse on Anatomical Characteristics . Jurnal MIPA Dan Pembelajarannya, 6(5), 5. Retrieved from https://journal3.um.ac.id/index.php/mipa/article/view/8382

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): May

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Abrar A. Naser, Wathik A. Aziz, Harith B. Abdulrahman, Ammar H. Saeed

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)