Analysis of differences in measurement of fair value and historical value of biological assets on income smoothing (Study on agricultural companies in Southeast Asia and Australia)

Authors

  • Nopfiana Lestari Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Satia Nur Maharani Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um066v1i42021p380-393

Keywords:

biological assets, fair value, historical value, income smoothing

Abstract

Biological assets are assets of living things in the form of animals and plants. There have been various debates regarding the measurement of biological assets. The debate is related to the use of fair value and historical value in measuring biological assets. Historical value is considered less relevant because it does not reflect present value, while fair value is not considered as expected because it causes fluctuations in earnings and retains manipulation. This study aims to analyze the effect of fair value and historical value measurements on biological assets on income smoothing and the tendency of earnings manipulation in companies that use fair value. The results of different tests show that there is not enough evidence to state that companies that use fair value tend to have higher income smoothing than companies that use historical value. Based on the results of this study, it is suggested that investors should not only focus on company profits but also use other considerations such as future economic conditions, management performance, and government regulations.

References

Amri, Qayuum. (2010), Kebutuhan Minyak Nabati Dunia Bergantung Pada CPO Indonesia. (Online), (http://www.kelapasawitindonesia.com), diakses pada 08 November 2015.

Ankarath, N., Mehta, K., Ghosh, T. P., & Alkafaji, Y. (2012). Memahami IFRS standar pelaporan keuangan internasional. Jakarta: Indeks.

Argilés Bosch, J. M., García Blandón, J., & Monllau, T. (2009). Fair value versus historic cost-valuation for biological assets: Implications for the quality of financial information. Documents de treball (Facultat d'Economia i Empresa. Espai de Recerca en Economia), 2009, E09/215.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Aryanto, Y. H. (2011). Theoretical failure of IAS 41: Agriculture. The Indonesian Institute of Accountants, 1.

Bangun, D. S., & Lestari, J. S. (2014). Analisis Perbedaan Kualitas Laba Sebelum dan Sesudah Adopsi IFRS kedalam PSAK pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skripsi S1 Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta yang tidak dipublikasikan.

Barlev, B & Haddad,JR (2003). Fair Value Accounting and The Management of The Firm. Critical Persective on Accounting 14:383-415. (Online), (http://www.audytax.mx/wp-content/), diakses pada 27 Februari 2016.

Beattrice, VA (2013). Fair Valur Measurement in Agriculture and The Potential to Mislead. Economy Series Issue 5, (Online), (http://www.utgjiu.ro), diakses 8 Januari 2016.

Belkaoui, Ahmed Riahi. (2007). Teori Akuntansi: Edisi 5 – Buku 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat Budiasih, Igan. 2007. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Praktik Perataan Laba. Jurnal. Jurusan Akuntansi. (Online), (http://ssrn.com), diakses 24 Mei 2016

Cahyati, Ari Dewi. (2011). Peluang Manajemen Laba Pasca Konvergensi IFRS: Sebuah Tinjauan Teoritis dan Empiris. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Komputerisasi Akuntansi (Online), Vol 2 (2) 1-7,(http://www.ejournal-unisma.net/ojs/index.php), diakses 08 November 2015.

Danbolt, Jo dan Ress, Bill. (2007). An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles. European Accounting Review, (Online), 17(2), p. 271-303 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/paper.cfm), diakses 3 September 2015.

Elad, Charles. & Kathleen Herbohn. (2011). Implementing Fair Value in the Agricultural Sector. Scotland: SATER.

Elad*, C. (2004). Fair value accounting in the agricultural sector: some implications for international accounting harmonization. European Accounting Review, 13(4), 621-641.

Fahmi, Irham. (2012). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan: Panduan bagi Akademisi, Manajer, dan Investor untuk Menilai dan Menganalisis Bisnis dari Aspek Keuangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

FASB. (2000). FASB Concept Statement No 7: Using Cash Flow Information and Present Value in Accounting Measurements. (Online), (http://www.fasb.org), diakses 18 Desember 2015.

FASB. (2010). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.157: Fair Value Measurements. (Online), (http://www.fasb.org), diakses 18 Desember 2015.

Feleaga, L et all. (2012). Theorical Considerations About Implementation of IAS41 in Romania.Theorical and Applied Economics Volume XIX No. 2(567):31-38. (Online), (http://store.ectap.roo/articole/686.pdf), diakses 25 Desember 2015.

Gradiyanto, A., & RAHARDJA, R. (2012). Pengaruh Komite Audit Terhadap Praktik Manajemen Laba (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2009–2011) (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).

Harahap, Sofyan Syafri. (2011). Teori Akuntansi Edisi Revisi 2011. Jakarta. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Hasan, Iqbal. (2004). Analisis Data Penelitian dengan Statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hery, S. E., & Si, M. (2009). Teori Akuntansi (Edisi Pertama). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Hery, S. E., & Si, M. (2012). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

IASC. (2012). IAS 4: Agriculture. (Online), (http://www.ifrs.org), diakses pada 22 Desember 2015.

Idris, I. P. (2014). Perbandingan Income Smoothing Sebelum dan Sesudah Konvergensi IFRS. Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar.

Invest in ASEAN. (2012). Agriculture. (Online), (http://investasean.asean.org/index.php/page/view/agriculture/view/850/newsid/90 4/agriculture.html), diakses tanggal 25 Juli 2016.

Kasmir. (2011). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Kaur, J. (2013). The Fairness of the Fair Value Concept. International Journal of Businessand Commerce. Vol 3, No.3:01-10, (Online), (http://www.ijbcnet.com), diakses 22 September 2015.

Keuangan, D. S. A. (2014). Standar akuntansi keuangan per efektif 1 Januari 2015. Jakarta: Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia.

Kusumaningtyas, Meta. (2012). Pengaruh Independensi Komite Audit dan Kepemilikan Institusional terhadap Manajemen Laba. Prestasi J uni 2012. (Online), 9(1):41-61, (www.jurnal.stiebankbpdjateng.ac.id%2Findex.php%2Fprestasi%2Farticle%2Fvie w%2FMetta), diakses 1 Agustus 2016.

Lara. (2015). Australia Jadi Negara Pertanian Organik Terbesar di Dunia. (Online), (http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/indonesian/), diakses tanggal 25 Juli 2016

Lin, J. W., Li, J. F., & Yang, J. S. (2006). The effect of audit committee performance on earnings quality. Managerial Auditing Journal. (Online), 21(9): 921-933, (https://www.researchgate.net/.../235275525), diakses 1 Agustus 2014.

Maruli, Saur & Mita, Aria Farah. Analisis Pendekatan Nilaai Wajar dan Nilai Historis dalam Penilaian Aset Biologis pada Perusahaan Agrikultur: Tinjauan Kritis Rencana Adopsi IAS 41, Simposium Nasional Akuntnsi 13(Online), (http://pdeb.fe.ui.ac.id), diakses 19 Januari 2015.

Melurmutia. Pengaruh Komite Audit Terhadap Manajemen Laba. SKRIPSI tidak diterbitkan. (Online), (https://repository.unhas.ac.id/handle/123456789/10751), diakses 1 Agustus 2016.

Nasional, K. P. (2010). Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah: Skripsi (Doctoral dissertation, Tesis, Disertasi, Artikel, Makalah, Tugas Akhir, Laporan Penelitian (Edisi Kelima). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang).

Pamudji, Sugeng. (2010). Pengaruh Independensi dan Efektivitas Komite Audit Terhadap Manajemen Laba. Journal Unnes (Online) 2(1):1-18, (journal.unnes.ac.idHome›Vol2, No1(2010) › Pamudji), diakses 1 Agustus 2016.

Penttinen et al. (2014). IAS Fair Value and Forest Evaluation on Farm Forestry. Proceding of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Forest Economics No. 40

Prawirosentono, Suyadi. (2002). Bahasan Komprehensif Strategi Pengambilan Keputusan Bisnis-Disertai-Analisis dan Studi Kasus. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Priyatno, Duwi. (2012). Cara Kilat Belajar Analisis Data dengan SPSS 20. Yogyakarta: CV ANDI OFFSET.

Rahmawati. (2012). Teori Akuntansi Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Graha Science.

Rayman, RA (2007). Fair Value Accounting and The Present Value Fallacy: The Need for an Alternative Conceptual Framework. The British Accounting Review 39:211-225, (Online), (http://www.scienceirect.com), diakses 24 Februari 2016.

Rohaeni, Dian & Aryati, Titik. (2012). Pengaruh Konvergensi IFRS Terhadap Income Smoothing Dengan Kualitas Audit Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 15, Banjarmasin, (Online), (http://sna.akuntansi.unikal.ac.id/makalah/100-SIPE-22.pdf), diakses 08 November 2015

Ronen, J. (2008), To Fair Value or Not to Fair Value: A Broader Prespective. ABACUS Vol. 44 No. 2, (Online), (http://ssrn.com), diakses 24 Februari 2016.

Salusu. (2000). Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik(Untuk Organisasi Publik dan Non-Profit). Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Scott, Wiliam R. (2012). Financial Accounting Theory - Sixth Edition. Toronto: Pearson Canada.

Setiadi, Nugroho J. (2008). Business Economic and Manajerial Decision Making (Aplikasi Teori Ekonomi dan Pengambilan Keputusan Manajerial Dalam Dunia Bisnis). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sonbay, Yolinda Yanti. (2010). Perbandingan Biaya Historis dan Nilai Wajar. Kajian Akuntans Pebruari 2010, i (Online), 2(1):1-8, (http://unisbank.ac.id), diakses 08 November 2015.

Stolowy, H & Breton, G. (2000). A Framework for the Clasificationof Accountans Manipulation. HEC Accounting and Manajement Control Working Paper No. 708, (Online), (http://papers.ssrn.com), diakses 24 Februari 2016.

Subramanyam. (2011). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Edisi 10. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sudrajat, A. (2010). Konsep Dasar Pengambilan Keputusan. Akhmad Sudrajad: Tentang Pendidikan (Online).

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukendar, Heri. (2010). Konsep Nilai Wajar (Faire Value) Dalam Standar Akuntansi Berbasis IFRS di Indonesia Apa dan Bagaimana. Binus Bussiness Review, (Online), 3(1):93- 106, (http://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/BBR/article/download/1286/1151), 25 Juli 2016

Sulistiawan, Dedhy dkk. (2011). Creative Accounting: Mengungkap Manajemen Laba dan Skandal Akuntansi. Jakarta:Salemba Empat.

Sutedi, Adrian. (2011). Good Corporate Governance. Jakarta:Sinar Grafika.

Suwardjono. (2008).Teori Akuntansi: Perekayasaan Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Suwardjono. (2014).Teori Akuntansi: Perekayasaan Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: FEB UGM.

Tudor, A. (2010). Income Smoothing and Earnings Informativeness: A matter of institutional characteristics or accounting standards?

Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting horizons, 17(3), 207-221.

World Bank Group. (2016). Strength of Investor Protection Index. (Online), (http://www.doingbussiness.com/rangkings), diakses pada 10 Agustus 2016.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles