MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING (CRT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um063.v5.i6.2025.2Keywords:
CRT, Kualitas, PembelajaranAbstract
Kualitas pembelajaran merupakan aspek krusial dalam proses pendidikan, namun berbagai tantangan sering kali muncul terkait dengan penerapannya di sekolah. Salah satu solusi untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran adalah melalui pendekatan culturally responsive teaching (CRT), yang menekankan pentingnya menciptakan lingkungan belajar inklusif bagi siswa dari beragam latar belakang budaya. Dengan menggunakan metode studi literatur yang mengacu pada berbagai sumber pustaka, penelitian ini menyoroti peran CRT dalam meningkatkan keterlibatan budaya siswa, menciptakan suasana pembelajaran yang efektif dan menyenangkan, serta mendorong interaksi yang lebih bermakna di kelas. Pendekatan ini tidak hanya relevan untuk mengatasi hambatan budaya, tetapi juga berkontribusi pada pengembangan pembelajaran yang lebih bermutu dan inklusif.
The quality of learning is a crucial aspect of the educational process, yet various challenges often arise in its implementation in schools. One effective solution to improve learning quality is through the approach of culturally responsive teaching (CRT), which emphasizes the importance of creating an inclusive learning environment for students from diverse cultural backgrounds. Using a literature review method that references various scholarly sources, this study highlights the role of CRT in enhancing cultural engagement among students, fostering an effective and enjoyable learning atmosphere, and promoting more meaningful classroom interactions. This approach is not only relevant in addressing cultural barriers but also contributes to the development of higher-quality and more inclusive education.
References
Awaliyah, C., Putri, F., & Rustini, T. (2023). Optimization of facilities and infrastructure in elementary schools through management of facilities and infrastructure. AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(2), 90–100.
Berkovich, I., & Benoliel, P. (2018). Marketing teacher quality: Critical discourse analysis of OECD documents on effective teaching and TALIS. Critical Studies in Education, 61(4), 496–511.
Clement, S. (1961). Seven principles of learning. The Clearing House, 36(1), 23–25.
Dias, M. (1995). Quality in higher education from an international point of view: The role of UNESCO. Higher Education in Europe, 20(1–2), 96–107.
Dow, D., & Gordon, M. (2024). Understanding CRT and its implications for family science. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(2), 295–311.
Ediger, M. (1990). Designing the curriculum. Education 3–13, 114, 636–640.
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882.
Hoglund, W. L., Klingle, K. L., & Hosan, N. E. (2015). Classroom risks and resources: Teacher burnout, classroom quality, and children's adjustment in high needs elementary schools. Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 337–357.
Hutchison, L., & McAlister-Shields, L. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching: Its application in higher education environments. Education Sciences, 10(5), 124.
Hutahaean, D., Sinaga, E., Mendrofa, G., Sipangkar, M., & Khairani, R. (2024). Identifikasi problematika pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar MIS Modern Az-Zakky. Jurnal Yudistira: Publikasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan dan Bahasa, 2(3), 166–172.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820.
Mardiah, M., & Ratna Puspita, N. (2023). Analisis pengaruh lingkungan belajar fisik terhadap perilaku belajar siswa. Buletin Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(2), 45–52.
Pandey, G. (2023). English teachers’ actions in action research: Developing a template for classroom purpose. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 42–52.
Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: Assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 13, 155367.
Sari, Y., Ikhwan, M., & Iffah, R. (2024). Management of infrastructure facilities in improving the quality of education at SD Nahdlatul Ulama, Sleman, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 8(2), 155–163.
Schartel, S. A. (2012). Giving feedback—An integral part of education. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 26(1), 77–87.
Singh, R., & Sarkar, S. (2015). Does teaching quality matter? Students' learning outcome related to teaching quality in public and private primary schools in India. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 153–163.
UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO’s conceptualization of quality: A framework for understanding, monitoring and improving education quality. UNESCO.
Wakhidah, A., & Bandono, A. (2022). Strategies for improving the quality of learning outcomes in elementary schools. KnE Social Sciences, 7(10), 188–199.
Widarti, H., Anggraini, T., Rokhim, D., & Syafruddin, A. (2022). Learning innovation content creators social media-based qualitative analysis to improve motivation and learning outcomes of professional teacher candidates: A systematic literature review. Orbital: The Electronic Journal of Chemistry, 14(4), 290–302.
Yang, Y., & Qian, J. (2018). Cooperative learning practices in university classrooms. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)
