Efektivitas model pengajaran IBMR (investigation-based-multiple-representation) berbantuan video pembelajaran terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika di SMA

Authors

  • Kharisma Liputo Jurusan Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang No. 5 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Endang Purwaningsih Jurusan Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang No. 5 Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Keywords:

Problem Solving, Pemecahan Masalah, IBMR Teaching Model, Model Pengajaran IBMR, Momentum and Impulse, Momentum dan Impuls

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the IBMR (Investigation-based-Multiple Representation) teaching model assisted by learning videos on physics problem-solving skills in momentum and impulse materials in high school. This study used the One Group Pretest-Posttest Design model for 36 students of class X MIPA 1. The effectiveness of this study was determined based on the average pretest and posttest scores and student responses to the learning process. The data collected in the form of pretest and post-test values ​​were analyzed using t-test and N gain analysis. Meanwhile, student responses were measured by looking for percentages. The results showed that the N-gain value for all indicators of problem-solving ability was 0.74 with a high category, significant physics problem-solving ability at a = 5% and student responses were categorized as very good with a value of > 85% to the learning process, so it can be concluded that it is concluded that the IBMR teaching model assisted by video learning is effective on students' physics problem-solving abilities, because this model helps students in physics modeling and understanding concepts through representation skills.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keefektifan model pengajaran IBMR (Investigation-based-Multiple Representation) berbantuan video pembelajaran terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika pada materi momentum dan impuls di SMA. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain model One Group Pretest-Posttest Desain kepada 36 siswa kelas X MIPA 1. Keefektifan pada penelitian ini ditentukan berdasarkan nilai rata-rata pretest dan posttest serta respon siswa terhadap proses pembelajaran. Data yang terkumpul berupa nilai pretest dan posttest dianalisis menggunakan uji t dan analisis N gain. Sedangkan respon siswa diukur dengan mencari persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai N-gain untuk seluruh indikator kemampuan pemecahan masalah sebesar 0,74 dengan kategori tinggi, signifikan kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika pada a = 5% dan respon siswa yang dikategorikan sangat baik dengan nilai > 85% terhadap proses pembelajaran, sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pengajaran IBMR berbantuan video pembelajaran efektif terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika siswa, dikarenakan model ini membantu siswa dalam pemodelan fisika dan pemahaman konsep melalui kemampuan representasi.

References

Buteler, L., & Coleoni, E. (2016). Solving Problems to Learn Concepts, How Does It Happen? A Case for Buoyancy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020144.

Ceberio, M., Almudí, J. M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590–609.

Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y., Nisrina, N., & Herayanti, L. (2018). Students’ Problem-Solving Skill in Physics Teaching with Virtual Labs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 10–87.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Huda, C., Siswanto, J., Kurniawan, A. F., & Nuroso, H. (2016). Development of Multi-Representation Learning Tools for The Course of Fundamental physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 739(1), 012024.

Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of Multiple Representation Use by Experts and Novices During Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010111.

Lucas, L. L., & Lewis, E. B. (2019). High school Students’ Use of Representations in Physics Problem Solving. School Science and Mathematics, 119(6), 327–339.

Maloney, D. P. (2011). An Overview of Physics Education Research on Problem Solving. Getting Started in PER, 2, 1–33.

Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2009). Do Students Use and Understand Free-Body Diagrams? Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(1), 010108.

S.Arikunto. (2013). Manajemen Penelitian (Revisi). PT. Rineke Cipta.

Siswanto, J., Susantini, E., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Practicality and Effectiveness of the IBMR Teaching Model to Improve Physics Problem Solving Skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(3), 381.

Sugiyono, P. D. (2015). Metode Penelitian Tindakan Komprehensif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukardi, H. M. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kompetensi Dan Praktiknya (Edisi Revisi). Bumi Aksara.

Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2017). The Role of Representations in Students’ Explanations of Four Phenomena in Physics: Dynamics, Thermal Physics, Electromagnetic Induction and Superposition. In Multiple Representations in Physics Education (pp. 255–287). Springer.

Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2012). Mechanical waves. Sears and Zemansky’s University Physics with Modern Physics. San Francisco, California, USA: Addison-Wesley, 472–508.

Downloads

Published

18-03-2022

How to Cite

Kharisma Liputo, & Endang Purwaningsih. (2022). Efektivitas model pengajaran IBMR (investigation-based-multiple-representation) berbantuan video pembelajaran terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika di SMA. Jurnal MIPA Dan Pembelajarannya (JMIPAP), 2(3), 209–216. Retrieved from http://journal3.um.ac.id/index.php/mipa/article/view/2260

Issue

Section

Articles